Monthly Archives: November 2009

Okla. state senator files bill that would allow DPS audio, video recordings to be made public

By Associated Press

4:31 PM CST, November 30, 2009

OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — A state senator has filed a bill that would allow audio and video recordings of the Department of Public Safety to be made public.

The bill by Sen. Jim Wilson, a Tahlequah Democrat, would amend the Oklahoma Open Records Act to include the recordings, which now do not fall under the definition of a “record”
http://www.kfsmState one of few to hold back videos

Senator Jim Wilson

wilson@oksenate.gov

 


TULSA WORLD

 

State one of few to hold back videos

7/21/09


Oklahoma is in the minority among regional states when it comes to releasing highway patrol videos shot from cameras mounted on the vehicle dashboards.

Texas, Missouri and Arkansas all treat state police dash camera videos as an open record, in contrast to Oklahoma where all trooper camera videos are closed to the public, a World survey of regional states found.

Arkansas State Police release its videos to the public after a case reaches the initial court stages, said Bill Sadler, public information officer for the Arkansas State Police.

The Texas Department of Public Safety releases video taken by trooper dash cameras after an investigation has been completed, said Tom Vinger, Texas DPS spokesman.

In Missouri, state officials release dash camera videos after a case has been adjudicated, a spokesman said.

Police dash camera videos are a relatively new record phenomenon. In Oklahoma, dash camera videos were considered public records until 2005, when the Department of Public Safety requested the state Legislature amend the Open Records Act to make all video and audio records closed to the public.

The amendment, contained in a bill with many exemptions requested by DPS, sailed through the Legislature with little fanfare.

The issue came to light a few weeks ago when media organizations began requesting a copy of the dash video camera recording of a May 24 encounter between an Oklahoma Highway Patrol trooper and a Creek Nation paramedic. The patrol initially refused a Tulsa World request to release the video and then later released it late on a Friday night.

OHP spokesman Capt. Chris West said the agency requested the audio and video recordings be closed to the public in 2005 largely out of concerns for both trooper safety and the privacy of residents.

“I can assure you it’s not about secrecy; it’s confidentiality,” West said.

But West added that “everything is subject to change,” when asked if the agency believed video and audio recordings should continue to be exempt from open record requests.

“I’m sure our administrators will be amenable to sit down with whether it be legislators or anybody else to maybe review it to see if it needed to stay this way or maybe there needed to be some modifications,” West said.

Read More

Lawmaker Opposes Plan to Use Cameras to Ticket Uninsured Drivers

Posted: Nov 30, 2009 3:54 PMUpdated: Nov 30, 2009 7:29 PM

Featured Video

The Department of Public Safety is considering using cameras on roadways to help regulate the number of drivers without insurance.

Enlarge this picture

The Department of Public Safety is considering using cameras on roadways to help regulate the number of drivers without insurance.
About 200 cameras would be placed around the state's roads.

Enlarge this picture

About 200 cameras would be placed around the state’s roads.
Cameras would randomly scan the bar code on car tags to identify uninsured drivers.

Enlarge this picture

Cameras would randomly scan the bar code on car tags to identify uninsured drivers.

By Charles Bassett, NEWS 9

OKLAHOMA CITY – A state lawmaker is speaking out against a proposal to use cameras to catch motorist who drive without insurance.

The Department of Public Safety is considering putting up 200 cameras on roadways throughout the state to crack down on drivers without insurance. The cameras would randomly scan the bar code on car tags. If the car comes back uninsured, the driver would be mailed a ticket.

The system would be an upgrade to the state’s electronic insurance verification system.

http://www.newson6.com/Global/story.asp?S=11593542

Tuesday, December 1 Maps Tax Opponents to Demand Public Debate

New Maps Tax Opponents to Demand Public Debate

When: Tuesday, December 1

Time: 10:30 am

Place: City Hall, East Steps

In the wake of Mayor Cornett’s refusal to follow through on his implied challenge to a public debate on the issues, opponents of the new Maps Tax will rally at City Hall Tuesday morning. A representative of each group will speak.

Porter Davis, Oklahoma Constitutional Alliance (OCA)spokesman for KillTheMapsTax.com, says citizens from across the political spectrum are coming together to demand that YesMaps groups hold a series of public debates. “Their arrogance, their total disdain for the need for public dialogue to let citizens see all sides of the issues, is totally against the idea of citizen democracy. The Oklahoma City Elite have gotten so used to have their pet projects funded on the backs of taxpayers, that they think they can run a million dollars worth of slick ads, call their latest scheme “Maps,” and we’ll buy whatever they’re selling.”

“This is a taxpayers’ issue that cuts across party lines. Progressives and liberals, conservatives and libertarians, independents and middle-of-the-roaders, labor unions and right-to-work advocates, are coming together to demand transparency and accountability on the new Maps Tax proposal.”
Oklahoma Constitutional Alliance local groups supporting the MAPS III debate:

OCPAC, Oklahoma chapter of Americans For Prosperity, Sooner Tea Party,
OK-SAFE, Shawnee/Tecumseh 912 Project, Moore/Norman 912 project
R3Publicans , Campaign For Liberty, Sooner Republican Assembly

“What particularly concerns us at this time is that the City Council seems hell-bent to push through a this New Maps Tax in the midst of an international financial crisis. The State of Oklahoma faces a $1 billion budget shortfall. City sales tax collections are down 9 consecutive months. Oklahoma’s unemployment is at a 20-year high, having lost 50,000 jobs so far in this deepening recession. The Federal Reserve predicts it will be at least six years before we reach “normal” conditions again. No credible economists advocate raising taxes as a way to combat recession. What we need are tax cuts to leave money with the taxpayers and create more jobs,” Davis says.

“Yet, the Mayor and his cronies refuse to debate the economic aspects of this issue.”

The spokesman for this OCA project is former Republican Oklahoma State Representative and small businessman, Porter Davis.

Call Porter Davis for more details at 405-286-0369.
porter@porterhdavis.com

Oklahoma City police use stricter criteria to ID gang members

BY MICHAEL MCNUTT   

Published: November 29, 2009

Oklahoma City police officers are using a more precise and uniform gauge of identifying members of criminal street gangs.

Officers recently completed filtering through names of suspected gang members and used criteria from a national database to identify them as being criminal gang members, said police Capt. Pat Byrne.

Officers are using criteria developed by the Violent Gang and Terrorist Organizations File, which is a part of the National Crime Information Center. It serves to identify known members of violent gangs and terrorist organizations.

 

What comes to mind when you think “Gang Member”?


 


. . . Or maybe this?


 

The article continues. .

Gang members have to meet certain elements, such as admitting while under arrest their membership in a gang, to get on the list. Or, they must meet three factors, such as wearing certain colors, clothing or jewelry, having certain tattoos or displaying certain hand signals or graffiti.

“What it does, it takes away the ability to be tagged as a gang member for having a pair of saggy pants,” Byrne said.



Read more:
http://newsok.com/oklahoma-city-police-use-stricter-criteria-to-id-gang-members/article/3421200?custom_click=headlines_widget#ixzz0YHKHi1YT

 

 

 

November 13, 2003

Testimony of Michael D. Kirkpatrick, Assistant Director in Charge, Criminal Justice Information Services Division, FBI

 

The FBI’s CJIS Division implemented the NCIC Violent Gang and Terrorist Organization File or “VGTOF” in December 1994. This file is designed to provide identifying information about violent criminal gang and terrorist organization members to protect the law enforcement community and the public.

 

. During security preparations for the 2002 Winter Olympic Games in Salt Lake City, Utah, the FBI determined that it would be advisable to have individuals of FBI domestic or international terrorism investigative interest included in VGTOF

. “Traditionally, NCIC person records serve the needs of the criminal justice community and are supported by the judicial process.”

 

But with the creation of VGTOF, that philosophy was expanded to support law enforcement investigative and information needs related to terrorism. The terrorist records, in particular, support national security and homeland security. Based on the positive results during the Olympics, the FBI has continued to make this terrorism information available to the criminal justice community and has enhanced VGTOF to better support these records.

 

Additionally, the FBI has coordinated with other entities to include their terrorist subject records in VGTOF with the goal of developing a centralized terrorist watch list.

 

The newly created Terrorist Screening Center will use the NCIC VGTOF as part of its daily operations.

 

http://www.fbi.gov/congress/congress03/ncic111303.htm

 

 

2003 was the same year that the DoJ exempted NCIC from the Privacy Act of 1974 which requires record accuracy and accountability

 

 

A federal audit of VGTOF in 2005 found an error rate of 40 percent based on a small sample of records. Are you on the VGTOF list?

http://www.reclaimdemocracy.org/articles/2007/government_watch_lists.php

 

 

audit report-

http://www.justice.gov/oig/reports/FBI/a0527/chapter7.htm

 

2007 follow up report

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/06/AR2007090601386.html

 

 

You may not picture someone that looks like this

Bill Sulzman

Colorado Springs peace activist Bill Sulzman is apparently listed in VGTOF as a “terrorist,” according to an article in the Colorado Springs Independent.

 

“Extremists” listed in FBI’s Violent Gang and Terrorist Organization File
In anticipation of the 2002 Olympics, the Joint Terrorism Task Force added “anarchists” and eight separate categories of “extremists” (such as “environmental extremist” and “Black extremist”) to the FBI’s computer database known as the Violent Gang and Terrorist Organization File (VGTOF). When patrol officers routinely check the name of a driver or a suspect in the computer of the National Crime Information Center (NCIC), the VGTOF database is automatically searched, too. A patrol officer who encounters a VGTOF “hit” is expected to notify the FBI

FBI Memo re Violent Gang and Terrorist Organization File (VGTOF)

 

“License and registration, please?” The officer stands beside your car. Behind you, his cruiser lights are flashing. Other motorists slow down to gawk. Your heart pounds.

“What have I done?” you ask. The officer explains that you ran a stop sign several blocks back. You never saw the sign, but no matter. It will be a small fine and off you will go. Everyone makes simple mistakes from time to time.

The officer takes your license and registration to his car. He enters your name into a database linked to his car by computer. A message flashes across his screen:

WARNING – APPROACH WITH CAUTION

THIS INDIVIDUAL IS ASSOCIATED WITH TERRORISM …

USE CAUTION AND IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE TERRORIST SCREENING CENTER AT (866) 872-9001 FOR ADDITIONAL DIRECTION.

Your plans for the evening have changed. You are now on the federal radar, listed and tagged as a potential threat. Your name is part of the FBI’s Violent Gang and Terrorist Organization File (VGTOF). Will you go home, or to a jail cell?

How did your name get on the list? You don’t know. You may never know. Perhaps you were seen at an antiwar rally. Or perhaps you contributed money to a candidate or cause that some anonymous soul views as suspect. Like it or not, however, every law enforcement officer in the country now need only log onto his computer to learn that you are a suspect.
http://www.reclaimdemocracy.org/articles/2007/government_watch_lists.php

 

Another thing to think about regarding “watchlists”, saggy pants aside.

The VGTOF and the Second Amendment

No Fly, No Buy-NO DUE Process

davekopel.org/2A/Mags/No-Fly-No-Buy.pdf

AxXiom


 

Oklahoma City ‘We Are Change-OK’ activists assaulted and arrested during action at mall / RedDirtReport.com

Oklahoma City ‘We Are Change-OK’ activists assaulted and arrested during action at mall / RedDirtReport.com

James Lane, founder of We Are Change Oklahoma shares his story with Red Dirt Report and Oklahoma Watchdog.
http://www.reddirtreport.com/news.php?id=13493

County joins others in state with isolation and quarantine policy

Nov. 29, 2009

Oklahoma’s Law is much the same after changes made or added in 2008-see below.

AxXiom


News From 91.3 KUWS

Douglas County joins others in state with isolation and quarantine policy

Story posted Friday at 11:38 a.m. 11/27/2009

Wisconsin counties have a little-known policy that allows forced isolation or quarantine of people using armed law enforcement and deputized civilians. Mike Simonson reports from Superior. This is to help health officials in a worst-case scenario to contain outbreaks.

Wisconsin statute requires each county to have an isolation and quarantine procedure. The order originated with the Centers for Disease Control from anthrax threats in 2001. But the policy is broader. It includes isolating people infected or even suspected of being infected with a contagious disease such as tuberculosis or in a flu pandemic. Douglas County Health Officer Deb Clasen says every county health officer in the state can now order that guards be put on infectious people.

http://www.businessnorth.com/kuws.asp?RID=3172

____________________________________________________

Oklahoma

State Quarantine and Isolation Statutes Updated April 2009

Oklahoma

Okla. Stat. tit. 63 §§ 1-502, 504

Authority. The State Board of Health shall have authority to adopt such rules and regulations, not inconsistent with law, as it deems necessary to aid in the prevention and control of communicable disease.

Whenever a local health officer determines or suspects that a person has a communicable disease, he may impose a quarantine on the place or premises where such person usually stays, and notice thereof shall be given in accordance with the rules and regulations of the State Board of Health.

**But you need to see administrative rules to really understand how our govt. has decided it would be best handle such a  scenario.   This is not where I would expect to find such serious alterations of law which were adopted in 2008.  See below**

Okla. Stat. tit. 21 § 1195

Penalties. Every person who having been lawfully ordered by any health officer to be detained in quarantine and not having been discharged leaves the quarantine grounds or willfully violates any quarantine law or regulation is guilty of a misdemeanor.

http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=17104

TITLE 310. OKLAHOMA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

310:521-7-1. Examination

The Commissioner may issue an order for the examination of any individual upon the suspicion or confirmation that said individual has a communicable disease. Such examination may include a clinical examination, a specific diagnostic test or tests, or a specific laboratory test or tests. The purpose of such examination(s) and/or test(s) is to determine the presence of the suspected infectious organism or the presence of indicators of the suspected infectious organism, and to determine the contagious state of the individual to the extent possible.
[Source: Added at 25 Ok Reg 1148, eff 5-25-08]

310:521-7-2. Treatment

The Commissioner may issue an order for the treatment of any individual suspected or confirmed to have a communicable disease. The Commissioner may also order the treatment of any individual or individuals exposed to certain infectious agents. Such treatment plans will be according to procedures developed within the Department.
[Source: Added at 25 Ok Reg 1148, eff 5-25-08]

310:521-7-3. Isolation or quarantine

(a) Isolation. The Commissioner may issue an order for the isolation of any individual or group of individuals upon determination:

(1) That such individual or individuals who are reasonably known or suspected to have a communicable disease constituting a biologic public health threat and who remain within the transmission period for said disease; and
(2) That isolation is the necessary means to control the spread of the agent and the disease constituting a biologic public health threat.

(b) Quarantine. The Commissioner may issue an order for the quarantine of any individual or group of individuals upon determination:

That such individual or individuals who are reasonably known or suspected to have been exposed to a communicable disease constituting a biologic public health threat and who remain within the incubation period for said disease; and

(2) That quarantine is the necessary means to contain the communicable disease constituting a biologic public health threat  to which an individual or individuals have been or may have been exposed.

(c) Affected area. The Commissioner may issue an order for the quarantine of a facility, complex, or campus including but not limited to an apartment complex, dormitory, health care facility, hotel, correctional facility, or the individuals therein.

[Source: Added at 25 Ok Reg 1148, eff 5-25-08]

Any person who is subject to an order of the Commissioner for isolation or quarantine and who contests such an order may request an individual proceeding or hearing. In order to uphold a quarantine order the Department must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the Respondent was, or was suspected of having been, exposed to an infectious disease constituting a biologic public health threat.

In order to uphold an isolation order the Department must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the Respondent has, or is suspected of having, an infectious disease constituting a biologic public health threat.

If requested, an individual proceeding pursuant to this subsection shall be convened as quickly as reasonably possible, which may be held telephonically or by other electronic means.  (see exceptions part c)

A Respondent may request a hearing verbally or in writing. If the request for hearing is verbal, it shall be the duty of the hearing officer to take a statement for the record of the Respondent’s reason for contesting the Commissioner’s order.

the Commissioner’s order is upheld at the conclusion of the hearing, the Respondent may appeal the administrative decision pursuant to Section 318 of Title 75 of the Oklahoma Statutes.

(b) Upon finding that there is probable cause to believe that any individual or individuals who are subject to an order of examination, treatment, isolation, or quarantine has failed to or refuse to comply with such order, the Commissioner may request an emergency order from the district court to enforce the Commissioner’s order.

If granted, the emergency order shall require the individual or individuals to be taken immediately into custody by law enforcement officials for the purpose of examination or treatment or to be detained for the duration of the order of isolation or quarantine or until the Commissioner determines that the risk of transmission of a biologic public health threat is no longer present.

(c) Subsections a or b of this section may be suspended in the event of a declaration of emergency by the Governor pursuant to Oklahoma law or upon written directive of the Commissioner of Health to employ a constitutionally-sufficient alternative process due to exigent circumstances during such emergency. Such suspension of subsections a and b shall only exist for the duration of the emergency.

[Source: Added at 25 Ok Reg 1148, eff 5-25-08]

Is there a constitutional alternative to Due Process of Law??

310:521-7-7. Health status monitoring
A representative of the Department shall monitor the health status of those under quarantine or isolation according to means dictated through procedure of the Department. Such means may include use of appropriate data collection forms, use of appropriate medical tests and or procedures, regular telephone calls, visits by local health personnel or other pre-determined providers, self-reports, reports of caregivers or healthcare providers, or by other means. If an individual or individuals under quarantine develop symptoms compatible with a disease constituting a biologic public health threat, then such individual or individuals may be further ordered into isolation.

[Source: Added at 25 Ok Reg 1148, eff 5-2-08

Oklahoma Office of Administrative Rules- OAR

www.oar.state.ok.us

State ending deal to accept free license tags for Highway Patrol vehicles

A ‘handshake’ deal that allowed the Florida Highway Patrol to use free license plates on its marked cars — plates provided by a company that sought state contracts — will end.

BY STEVE BOUSQUET

Herald/Times Tallahassee Bureau

TALLAHASSEE — The Florida Highway Patrol has received free license plates for troopers’ marked cars for years under a handshake agreement with a vendor that sought agency contracts.

The practice continued in Florida after enactment of a 2006 gift ban aimed at outlawing free merchandise to state officials but will end because the agency’s director wants to avoid what she calls “the appearance of impropriety.”

The 3M Corp. said the arrangement provided valuable research to help the company improve its digital license plate technology by exposing the plates to Florida heat and humidity.

But state motor vehicle agency director Electra Bustle, who oversees the Highway Patrol and inherited the arrangement, said the agency will seek bids in the future when 3M’s plates wear out.

”The relationship was based on a gentlemen’s handshake,” Bustle said. “It’s just cleaner to go ahead and do it by the book.”

The deal was made during the tenure of two people not retained by Gov. Charlie Crist: former motor vehicle chief Fred Dickinson and former FHP Director Chris Knight. Knight told 3M in 2003 that the free plates are a “morale booster.”

Bustle said she has seen no sign of agency favoritism toward 3M in her two years there and noted that last year 3M lost a bidding fight to sell license tag decals to the state.

Digital license plates began arriving in 1999, free of charge, from 3M Corp. in St. Paul, Minn., to help the company in ”developing new and improved vehicle registration products for our customers,” a company official told the state in a 2005 e-mail.

Digital license plates use a color printing process to affix letters and numbers to a flat plate, rather than being stamped by an embossing machine like traditional plates.

”There’s nothing like in-field performance,” said Jerry Karel, a technical director in 3M’s traffic safety systems unit. “License plate sheeting has to last five-plus years, and durability is one of our most important requirements.”

The company released documents showing results of a week of field testing in June 2005 at eight FHP stations, including Tampa and Miami.

No contract was ever signed formalizing the deal with 3M. The tags are on 1,723 vehicles, and the last batch arrived in 2006.

Another agency, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, also uses 3M digital plates on 113 pool vehicles, but the FDLE paid for them. The agency provided documentation showing FDLE paid $6.11 per plate, or $690, in 2007.

3M also contracts with PRIDE Enterprises of St. Petersburg, the prison labor firm, to sell sheeting that inmates use to make embossed tags for Florida motorists’ cars. By law, PRIDE controls manufacture of the tags — about 8 million a year — and sells them to the state for $1.67 each.

Asked if 3M’s digital plates are superior to PRIDE’s embossed plates, Karel said: “Both have to meet much the same durability requirements.”

A bill (SB 914) filed for the 2009 session by Sen. Rudy Garcia, a Republican from Hialeah, would require all plates to have a bar code number. The 3M digital plates use bar codes and PRIDE’s do not. Garcia could not be reached for comment Friday.

Read More;

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/florida/story/870115.html

Mind Your Tweets: The CIA Social Networking Surveillance System

From Wikileaks

Jump to: navigation, search

October 24, 2009

By Tom Burghardt (Global Research)[1]
That social networking sites and applications such as Facebook, Twitter and their competitors can facilitate communication and information sharing amongst diverse groups and individuals is by now a cliché.

It should come as no surprise then, that the secret state and the capitalist grifters whom they serve, have zeroed-in on the explosive growth of these technologies. One can be certain however, securocrats aren’t tweeting their restaurant preferences or finalizing plans for after work drinks.

No, researchers on both sides of the Atlantic are busy as proverbial bees building a “total information” surveillance system, one that will, so they hope, provide police and security agencies with what they euphemistically call “actionable intelligence.”

Build the Perfect Panopticon, Win Fabulous Prizes!

In this context, the whistleblowing web site Wikileaks published a remarkable document October 4 by the INDECT Consortium, the Intelligence Information System Supporting Observation, Searching and Detection for Security of Citizens in Urban Environment.

Hardly a catchy acronym, but simply put INDECT is working to put a human face on the billions of emails, text messages, tweets and blog posts that transit cyberspace every day; perhaps your face.

According to Wikileaks, INDECT’s “Work package 4″ is designed “to comb web blogs, chat sites, news reports, and social-networking sites in order to build up automatic dossiers on individuals, organizations and their relationships.” Ponder that phrase again: “automatic dossiers.”

This isn’t the first time that European academics have applied their “knowledge skill sets” to keep the public “safe”–from a meaningful exercise of free speech and the right to assemble, that is.

Last year The Guardian reported that Bath University researchers’ Cityware project covertly tracked “tens of thousands of Britons” through the installation of Bluetooth scanners that capture “radio signals transmitted from devices such as mobile phones, laptops and digital cameras, and using the data to follow unwitting targets without their permission.”

One privacy advocate, Simon Davies, the director of Privacy International, told The Guardian: “This technology could well become the CCTV of the mobile industry. It would not take much adjustment to make this system a ubiquitous surveillance infrastructure over which we have no control.”

Which of course, is precisely the point.

As researchers scramble for a windfall of cash from governments eager to fund these dubious projects, European police and security agencies aren’t far behind their FBI and NSA colleagues in the spy game.

The online privacy advocates, Quintessenz, published a series of leaked documents in 2008 that described the network monitoring and data mining suites designed by Nokia Siemens, Ericsson and Verint.

The Nokia Siemens Intelligence Platform dubbed “intelligence in a box,” integrate tasks generally done by separate security teams and pools the data from sources such as telephone or mobile calls, email and internet activity, bank transactions, insurance records and the like. Call it data mining on steroids.

Ironically enough however, Siemens, the giant German electronics firm was caught up in a global bribery scandal that cost the company some $1.6 billion in fines. Last year, The New York Times described “a web of secret bank accounts and shadowy consultants,” and a culture of “entrenched corruption … at a sprawling, sophisticated corporation that externally embraced the nostrums of a transparent global marketplace built on legitimate transactions.”

According to the Times, “at Siemens, bribery was just a line item.” Which just goes to show, powering the secret state means never having to say you’re sorry!

Social Network Spying, a Growth Industry Fueled by Capitalist Grifters

The trend by security agencies and their corporate partners to spy on their citizens has accelerated greatly in the West since the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

This multi-billion industry in general, has been a boon for the largest American and European defense corporations. Among the top ten companies listed by Washington Technology in their annual ranking of the “Top 100″ prime government contractors, all ten–from Lockheed Martin to Booz Allen Hamilton–earned a combined total of $68 billion in 2008 from defense and related homeland security work for the secret state.

And like Siemens, all ten corporations figure prominently on the Project on Government Oversight’s Federal Contractor Misconduct Database (FCMD), which tracks “contract fraud, environmental, ethics, and labor violations.” Talk about a rigged game!

Designing everything from nuclear missile components to eavesdropping equipment for various government agencies in the United States and abroad, including some of the most repressive regimes on the planet, these firms have moved into manufacturing the hardware and related computer software for social networking surveillance in a big way.

Wired revealed in April that the FBI is routinely monitoring cell phone calls and internet activity during criminal and counterterrorism investigations. The publication posted a series of internal documents that described the Wi-Fi and computer hacking capabilities of the Bureau’s Cryptographic and Electronic Analysis Unit (CEAU).

New Scientist reported back in 2006 that the National Security Agency “is funding research into the mass harvesting of the information that people post about themselves on social networks.”

And just this week in an exclusive report published by the British high-tech publication, The Register, it was revealed that “the government has outsourced parts of its biggest ever mass surveillance project to the disaster-prone IT services giant formerly known as EDS.”

That work is being conducted under the auspices of the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), the British state’s equivalent of America’s National Security Agency.

Investigative journalist Chris Williams disclosed that the American computer giant HP, which purchased EDS for some $13.9 billion last year, is “designing and installing the massive computing resources that will be needed to analyse details of who contacts whom, when where and how.”

Work at GCHQ in Cheltenham is being carried out under “a secret project called Mastering the Internet.” In May, a Home Office document surfaced that “ostensibly sought views on whether ISPs should be forced to gather terabytes of data from their networks on the government’s behalf.”

The Register reported earlier this year that telecommunications behemoth Detica and U.S. defense giant Lockheed Martin were providing GCHQ with data mining software “which searches bulk data, such as communications records, for patterns … to identify suspects.” (For further details see: Antifascist Calling, “Spying in the UK: GCHQ Awards Lockheed Martin £200m Contract, Promises to ‘Master the Internet’,” May 7, 2009)

It seems however, that INDECT researchers like their GCHQ/NSA kissin’ cousins in Britain and the United States, are burrowing ever-deeper into the nuts-and-bolts of electronic social networking and may be on the verge of an Orwellian surveillance “breakthrough.”

As New Scientist sagely predicted, the secret state most certainly plans to “harness advances in internet technology–specifically the forthcoming ‘semantic web’ championed by the web standards organisation W3C–to combine data from social networking websites with details such as banking, retail and property records, allowing the NSA to build extensive, all-embracing personal profiles of individuals.”

Profiling Internet Dissent

Pretty alarming, but the devil as they say is in the details and INDECT’s release of their “Work package 4″ file makes for a very interesting read. And with a title, “XML Data Corpus: Report on methodology for collection, cleaning and unified representation of large textual data from various sources: news reports, weblogs, chat,” rest assured one must plow through much in the way of geeky gibberish and tech-speak to get to the heartless heart of the matter.

INDECT itself is a rather interesting amalgamation of spooks, cops and academics.

According to their web site, INDECT partners include: the University of Science and Technology, AGH, Poland; Gdansk University of Technology; InnoTech DATA GmbH & Co., Germany; IP Grenoble (Ensimag), France; MSWiA, the General Headquarters of Police, attached to the Ministry of the Interior, Poland; Moviquity, Spain; Products and Systems of Information Technology, PSI, Germany; the Police Service of Northern Ireland, PSNI, United Kingdom (hardly slouches when it comes to stitching-up Republicans and other leftist agitators!); Poznan University of Technology; Universidad Carlos III de Madrid; Technical University of Sofia, Bulgaria; University of Wuppertal, Germany; University of York, Great Britain; Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic; Technical University of Kosice, Slovakia; X-Art Pro Division G.m.b.H, Austria; and finally, the Fachhochschule Technikum, also in Austria.

I don’t know about you, but I find it rather ironic that the European Union, ostensible guardians of democracy and human rights, have turned for assistance in their surveillance projects to police and spy outfits from the former Soviet bloc, who after all know a thing or two when it comes to monitoring their citizens.

Read More;

http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Mind_Your_Tweets:_The_CIA_Social_Networking_Surveillance_System

Oklahoma DPS Desperately Seeking Automated Enforcement

Shedding some light on the recent news

http://newsok.com/oklahoma-could-keep-an-eye-on-uninsured-motorists/article/3420697

 

October 16, 2009
To: All Interested Vendors
Re: Request for Information
The State of Oklahoma, Department of Public Safety, is requesting information regarding a system of automated enforcement of vehicle insurance

Project Description
DPS envisions a system of automated enforcement of vehicle insurance which incorporates, at a minimum, the following processes:
• capture vehicle license plate data from stationary locations along selected highways using: cameras
barcode scanners. Oklahoma’s new license plates include a barcode. All license plates will be replaced with the new license plate by December 31, 2009. It should be noted that some license plate mounts or surrounds obscure, partially or in whole, the barcode.
• other technology proposed by the responder

The Department of Public Safety (DPS) has developed, created, and currently administers, in cooperation with insurance carriers licensed to sell personal lines vehicle insurance in Oklahoma, a dynamic system for verification of vehicle insurance by motor license agents of the Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC) at the time of vehicle registration, law enforcement when making a roadside vehicle stop, and courts when allowing a person to provide proof of the existence of vehicle insurance on the date a citation was written for no insurance.

The current system is called the Oklahoma Compulsory Insurance Verification System (OCIVS).
Obviously, this type of enforcement of vehicle insurance laws, by its natures, is limited to personal contact with the individual. DPS is now interested in expanding the verification process to include a system of automated enforcement of vehicle insurance that will encompass a larger target group without expending manpower.

  • use the captured data to obtain registration data from OTC. Basically, the license plate number would be used to obtain the VIN and the owner’s name and address from OTC. The VIN is necessary for the insurance verification process.
  • use the VIN to inquire against OCIVS to verify whether vehicle insurance exists for the vehicle. OCIVS would reply to the inquiry with a “Confirmed” or “Unconfirmed” response.
  • In some cases, the insurance company would provide a reason along with an “Unconfirmed” response notification to the owner of a vehicle for which an “Unconfirmed” response is received. The notification would be by first-class mail to the owner’s address provided by OTC. T

The notification would include:

  • • vehicle information
  • • the date and time insurance was unable to be confirmed for the vehicle
  • • a statement of violation of state law, including the statutory citation
  • • a fine or administrative penalty (to be determined later) to be paid by the owner as directed on the notification
  • • a statement of the consequences of failure to pay (to be determined later)
  • • record keeping that would provide DPS with daily statistics and related data on vehicles:
  • • for which license plate data was captured
  • • for which registration data was obtained from OTC
  • • for which insurance verification inquiries were made, and the results of those inquiries
  • • for which notification was mailed to the owner

This system would be limited to vehicles covered by personal lines vehicle insurance policies; vehicles covered by commercial policies are not part of OCIVS and therefore would be exempt from this system. While this system of automated enforcement of vehicle insurance only considers application to
vehicles registered in Oklahoma with inquiries against OCIVS, responses which include vehicles registered in any or all other states will be considered. It will be each responder’s responsibility to determine how to access registration and insurance information from a state other than Oklahoma.

 

RFI Response Instructions
The State is asking all interested parties to submit a response containing the following information:
• Your interest in providing the services/supplies.
• A brief description of past experience providing similar services/supplies.

• Your opinion, based on your past experience, on whether the State has identified all the major components necessary to complete this project? If not, please provide information on other necessary components.
• A list of potential problems/risks that the State may encounter during this project, and any ideas or suggestions about how such problems/risks should be addressed in a solicitation.
• Your best estimated information on how each process would be accomplished, including specific methodology, software, hardware, connectivity, security, etc., and the estimated time frame in which each process would be accomplished.
• Your best estimated time frame for completing the project.
• The State of Oklahoma and DPS would not provide any funding for this system; all costs would be the responsibility of the successful bidder, should the system be bid and awarded.
The method of payment to the successful bidder would be reimbursement from funds received from fines or administrative penalties. With this in mind, please provide an estimate of income your company would find necessary and sufficient to provide the services/supplies required to implement, administer and support this system. This estimate should be given in monthly increments.

See Document;

www.dps.state.ok.us/…/RFI%20automated%20insurance%20enforcement%20OKLAHOMA.pdf

Woolly Boogers Loose in the Oklahoma State House? Online insurance verification bill

Original Post Feb, 23, 2009

by Kaye Beach

11/27/09

In light of today news, I thought “Woolly Boogers” was worthy of reposting.

Oklahoma could keep an eye on uninsured motorists
Read more:
http://newsok.com/oklahoma-could-keep-an-eye-on-uninsured-motorists/article/3420697?custom_click=lead_story_title#ixzz0Y8L9yIFW

Original Post Feb, 23, 2009

WOOLLY BOOGERS

In the Oklahoma State House?

What in the heck is a woolly booger?


A Real Live Woolly Booger

“In truth, they are the larvae of the Spotted Tussock Moth. More night fliers. Just what we need around here.”

Always Trust a Woolly Booger

Woolly Boogers are quite useful. People have their long-range forecasting models and their Doppler radars, learned meteorologists, and all sorts of ‘equipment’ to forecast the weather. With all that equipment, one would think they’d have the weather pegged, wouldn’t one? But, no, most of the time they say it will do one thing and it actually does quite another.

Goats, on the other hand, have a much more sophisticated and reliable means of predicting the weather. At least in the case of the winter weather. You see, the way it works is that in the Fall if one notices many Wooly Boogers crawling about , resting on latches, falling in the water tub, crawling up the side of the barn, or residing on that dried leaf you had your eye on from way across the pasture, it means we are going to have an ‘exciting’ winter.

In light of the useful nature of the much maligned Woolly Booger, I hereby name Representative Key, Reynolds, Ritze and any others who expressed their concern about the ramifications of this and similar measures, Honorary Woolly Boogers for their reliable forecasting as to the weather that lies ahead for the people of this state.  Well Done! 2/23/09

Now we know what a woolly booger is.

That technical lingo that those highfalutin’ lawmakers use makes me feel so uneducated!

Woolly boogers and conspiracy theories are the terms used by Rep. Ken Miller (kenmiller@okhouse.gov (405) 557-7360) to characterize some House members and their concerns about HB2013.

Miller offers that he helped install a GPS device on a friend’s car and that it had nothing to do with a bar code (??) He says that the barcode on our new license plates are “empty” and he has bar codes on his groceries and  of the concerns raised, Miller says that he heard a lot of things that “Frankly just don’t concern me at all,(snicker)” (30:55 on audio)

Bar Code! We Don’t Need No Stinking Bar Codes!


The audio file can be accessed here
http://www.lsb.state.ok.us/
select the date, Feb 19th then select track # 1008 (HB2013) to listen.

Go to 19:50 time on the audio file to get to the interesting part, the debate.  The previous 19 minutes consists of Rep. Miller presenting bill 2013, ostensibly a bill designed to clean up the language of an earlier bill regarding insurance verification for motorists passed 1 or 2 years ago.  *Yawn* And questions from Rep. Ritze, Rep. Key and Rep. Reynolds and Rep. Morrissette regarding the following  opics

(note: I am paraphrasing the exchange)

*Is the bill a “requested bill”   and who requested it?

Rep. Miller answers that, Yes. It was requested by DPS, the OK. Tax Commission, the  OK.Insurance Department and “Industry” (
Which refers to InsureNet.)

*Why was the deadline for implementing the original bill (July 1 2008)  missed?

Miller said some small companies had not achieved compliance due to not reporting properly.

Listen from 2:55 to 4:55 for Rep. Miller’s too-twisty-to-type reply when asked to name what small insurance company was out of compliance and why by Reynolds.

See this newsarticle dated Dec. 29, 2008

Oklahoma Electronic Insurance Verification System Not Reliable Yet

Excerpt:

A new electronic system to verify automobile insurance in Oklahoma is operational, but not yet reliable.

A law passed in 2006 takes effect Jan. 1, 2009, allowing law enforcement agencies and tag agents to check for up-to-date automobile insurance electronically through a database maintained by the Department of Public Safety.

The system is in place, but testing shows it is accurate only 60 percent of the time, Oklahoma Tax Commission officials said.

Because of that, law enforcement officials and tag agents are being told not to rely on the information it provides, said David Beatty, the department’s project manager for the Oklahoma Compulsory Insurance Verification System.. . .

http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/southcentral/2008/12/29/96625.htm

*Had there been discussion between involved parties and InsureNet and is the new or altered language the result of that communication.

Miller said (paraphrasing) that Yes.  There had been communication and while InsureNet submitted suggestions, none of their language was used.

Rep. Key expressed concern over system glitches that might show a motorist is uninsured when, in fact they are and then their car is impounded disrupting the person’s livelihood.

Rep. Ritze at 11:16 asks if this is a proposed online database shared with DPS and had DPS’s database ever been hacked or breached. (Later it is revealed by Reynolds that, in fact DPS computer database security was recently was breached.  I have not located a news story on this but will find out more.)

UPDATED

Breach puts information in peril

http://newsok.com/article/3110406/1187986334

August 25, 2007

Someone hacked into computers at three Oklahoma law enforcement agencies and may have stolen private information meant only for police use, the state Department of Public Safety announced Friday”

The breach involved information used by the Oklahoma Law Enforcement Telecommunications System, (OLETS)a statewide computer network used by dispatchers to obtain instant access to all types of local, state and federal law enforcement databases.
Police dispatchers typically use the system to verify the status of driver licenses, vehicle registration and to check for outstanding warrants and criminal history

Any information accessed by dispatchers that was displayed on their computer screen may have been sent to a third party by a computer virus found on the three affected computers. Both driver license numbers and Social Security numbers are listed in the database along with names and addresses, Thaxton said

How it happened
The security breach was the first discovered in the computer network, which has been in use since 1986. West said computers law enforcement agencies use for the Oklahoma Law Enforcement Telecommunications System  (OLETS, OK Nlets)often serve a variety of other functions, including unrestricted Internet access.

Also SEE InsureNet False Claims

Rep Miller states he had no idea and continually reintegrates that the intent of HB2013 is simply to “clean up language.”

*Had there been discussion between involved parties and InsureNet and is the new or altered language the result of that communication.

(15:50) Miller said (paraphrasing) that, “Yes,” there had been communication and while InsureNet submitted suggestions, none of their language was used.

Reynolds asked what would be InsureNet’s interest in changes.  Miller says because they (InsureNet) would like to be the carrier.

I’m sure you are catching the drift of this back and forth by this point so I’ll skip any further blow by blow.

The audio file can be accessed at
http://www.lsb.state.ok.us/ . Select the date, Feb 19th then select track # 1008 (HB2013)to listen.

At 30:47 you can hear Rep. Miller speak to the issue of “woolly boogers.”

So, I began to tear up the web searching for info that will illuminate this issue.  Are private companies driving legislation in our state, promising heaps of revenue to other companies (in this case insurance) and to state agencies and is this revenue to be ill-gotten by devising more and more intrusive ways of “catching” us?  Is this what is driving the apparent burning need for umpteen plus forty databases all interconnected, gleaning every smidge of personal, biographical and biometric info possible AND hooking our virtual selves up with foreign countries?  From my scrutiny of AAMVA, the reigning masters of private industry driving legislation for the sole purpose of endlessly milking the American people, the ultimate cash cow for these companies, I’s say at the very least we ought to look into this.  I can say with all certainty that AAMVA works exactly this way and I am sure they are spreading the good news to all of their associates.  This is NOT good old privatization!  This is Public Private Partnerships or PPP’s. You would not want to confuse the two ideas because they don’t remotely work the same.  Public Private Partnerships make deals with governmental agencies so that they have the benefit of government taxing and enforcement to secure their companies fortune.  These companies present their wares showcasing how it will bring in heaps of revenue to the government.  They help to create laws and policies to justify and implement schemes that support these products.  In a nutshell, what we get is corporate government.  Not government by and for and of the people.  This was the genesis of Real ID.

Here is a good explanation of why Public Private Partnerships should not be equated with the simple notion of privatization, which we associate with smaller government and more efficiency.

Excerpt:

It is little understood by the general public how public/private partnerships can be used, not as a way to diminish the size of government, but in fact, to increase government’s power.

Slowly, the whole comes together. By the time people realize the truth, it’s already in place. Policy is set. [. . . ]

And Public/Private Partnerships are becoming the fastest growing process to impose such policy. State legislatures across the nation are passing legislation, which calls for the implementation of PPPs.

Beware. These bonds between government and private international corporations are a double-edged sword. They come armed with government’s power to tax, the government’s power to enforce policy and the government’s power to enforce eminent domain.

At the same time, the private corporations use their wealth and extensive advertising budgets to entrench the policy into our national conscience. Cute little jingles or emotional commercials can be very useful tools to sell a government program.

http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/deweese081507.htm

How about InsureNet?

Well, InsureNet is an associate of AAMVA.  Judging from the 35 page long document-who isn’t an associate of AAMVA’s?

Yes, life is good for AAMVA!InsureNet provides the wold’s only accurate and non-invasive vehicle insurance verification system. It embraces all states, every jurisdiction inside each state, every insurer and is intrastate, interstate and
international in operation.
It is currently connected to
every state in the nation and has been recognized as
the national standard for law enforcement.

More on AAMVA:

From the Stop Real ID Coalition blogspot

Aside from First, Fourth and Tenth amendment issues, the Real ID Act has another major downside. DHS has named AAMVA (American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators) the “backbone” of the Real ID Act. AAMVA is an international organization. AAMVA is promoting the Driver’s License Agreement. The agreement calls for the United States, Mexico and Canada to share all drivers’ information stored in each country’s respective DMV databases. Grant money from the federal government has been available to States to participate in the DLA. http://www.aamva.org/aamva/DocumentDisplay.aspx?id=%7BC600908E-2538-4135-8166-1B25BB682698%7D This is the precursor to the North American Union otherwise named the Security and Prosperity Partnership. If we want to stop the NAU or SPP we MUST repeal the Real ID Act. I have the actual DLA paperwork. Scary does not do it justice. It threatens State’s rights and U.S. sovereignty.

Then there is
this
article from 2006

Excerpt:

InsureNet has developed and owns a patented automated system and method for providing accurate, on-the-spot insurance status verification by officers responding to the scene of an accident or a routine traffic stop. “The parts are now in place for the first-ever national vehicle insurance verification system that will allow law enforcement to immediately, at the scene, accurately determine the insurance status of a vehicle,” said Nlets’ Executive Director, Steve Correll. “This no-cost service
(Oh, someone will pay.  Guess who?!) by Nlets and InsureNet  intended to enable those who protect our society to do their jobs more effectively and safely.” Securely housed within Nlets’ national data center in Phoenix,

OK-SAFE
Inc. asks some very good questions;

-InsureNet or DragNet? Apparently Oklahoma is entertaining ideas of adopting a vehicle surveillance system called InsureNet to target “uninsured vehicles,” and which is linked to such international organizations as AAMVA (model of the REAL ID requirements)

Utilizing ALPR (Automatic License Plate Recognition) cameras and other technology, the system can scan a license plate in 2 seconds and verify if the vehicle is insured or not.  In one 8-hour shift, thousands of unsuspecting drivers could have their vehicle insurance status data checked electronically. (A money maker for the insurance companies and stockholders?)

Calls to Representative Ken Miller about HB 2013
would be in order

-Couple a vehicle surveillance system with the current pending Oklahoma legislation attempting to expand the reasons to collect DNA from Oklahomans, the question has to be asked - just what is going on in Oklahoma?

OK-SAFE, Inc. thanks you for your prompt action on these important topics and, as always, encourages you to “read the bill” before making decisions to support or oppose.

Here
is a brochure from 3M on their Digital License Plate System-These are our new plates.

And This One on Electronic Vehicle Registration

Here is some info on ALRP and how it is used.
Source
http://www.comptonasap.com/public_ASAP.pdf

Automatic License Plate Recognition (ALPR) Technology

The ASAP system will utilize “Automatic License Plate Recognition” (ALPR) technology. The ALPR software utilizes advanced optical character recognition (OCR) in order to read and record vehicle license plates in day or night conditions. All vehicle license plates are then automatically run through a “wanted” system. This system will automatically notify the Command Center of any “Hits” and the current location of the vehicle. (emphasis added)

Do we no longer subscribe to the notion of Probable Cause?  I thought that there needed to be a darn good reason to search a person in this country. This IS a
dragnet!

And couple that tech with this tech.

Mobile Wireless Surveillance Cameras

A mobile surveillance camera located in a parked vehicle would replace a traditional surveillance crew. The vehicle would be parked next to targeted locations and monitored via a wireless link. The risk of compromise is minimal since decoy vehicles would appear unoccupied. This system offers a substantial cost savings to the Sheriff’s Department as only one deputy would be needed to conduct surveillance from a safe location versus utilizing a team of deputies in the field.

Fair warning to any who wants to start that “if you aren’t doing anything wrong” line of reasoning-Don’t!  I am not “Human Being Under Glass-a modern art exhibit!   Are we all under suspicion all the time like naughty school children?  And who presumes to monitor us day and night?  Our superiors? Our lords, our masters?  These officials are my peers, my equals-they are public SERVANTS.  They have no right to mass surveil us without suspicion!

But wait, there’s more.

ALPR Equipped Sheriff Radio Cars

The Automatic License Plate Recognition system can be applied to Sheriff radio cars. As the radio car drives throughout its jurisdiction, the ALPR system is continuously reading and checking the license plate of vehicles against a “wanted” list. The ALPR system will automatically notify the deputy of any “hits” it receives such as a stolen vehicle, vehicle wanted for a shooting, etc.

ALPR Equipped Mobile Vans

ALPR technology could also be utilized to equip surveillance vans. The vans would utilize a bank of digital surveillance cameras with nighttime capability and ALPR software. The vans could be utilized in a visible or undercover surveillance mode. The

ALPR vans could be deployed as needed at checkpoints, airports, shipping ports or any other number of special details. The true strengths of these vans would come out when they are deployed on freeway overpasses or freeway on/off ramps throughout Los Angeles County. This can be especially useful when a specific vehicle is being sought

Source link
http://www.comptonasap.com/public_ASAP.pdf

Somebody sure did a good job selling the L.A. County Sheriff’s Department on this setup, I swear I can hear the author breathing hard as I read.

***

I have looked at documents and read up on this issue for the last 20 hours and I will be posting more on what I have found but for the sake of ever getting this posted, I have to stop here.  There is so much to tell yet so little time.

Here is the bottom line as far as I am concerned;

This is just one more avenue leading us to a total surveillance society.

Take a look at this freshly released
Surveillance: Citizens and the State
ordered in 2004 to be undertaken by The House of Lords, UK. On the effects and concerns about the effects on “the impact that government surveillance and data collection have upon the privacy of citizens and their relationship with the State.”

I have yet to read this lengthy report but, I am confident that it will put Rep. Miller’s unbearably witty rhetoric on “conspiracies” and “woolly boogers” firmly into proper context.  Tactics like ridicule are losing sway with the public who is beginning to become familiar enough with the intrusive technologies and schemes already in place to sense and see for themselves the danger inherit in them.

The UK is only a step or two ahead of us and what is taking place there is a harbinger for the US.  I predict that this report marks the beginning of a furious degree of utterly impotent back peddling as the tangible results of this folly become undeniable.

We should take a lesson from our British cousins in this as well as the consequences they suffer from their inclusion into the European Union.  Some things, once established, cannot be undone.

And as for the Woolly Boogers-the
wise goat
tells us just what it is they are good for;

Always Trust a Woolly Booger

Woolly Boogers are quite useful. People have their long-range forecasting models and their Doppler radars, learned meteorologists, and all sorts of ‘equipment’ to forecast the weather. With all that equipment, one would think they’d have the weather pegged, wouldn’t one? But, no, most of the time they say it will do one thing and it actually does quite another.

Goats, on the other hand, have a much more sophisticated and reliable means of predicting the weather. At least in the case of the winter weather. You see, the way it works is that in the Fall if one notices many Wooly Boogers crawling about , resting on latches, falling in the water tub, crawling up the side of the barn, or residing on that dried leaf you had your eye on from way across the pasture, it means we are going to have an ‘exciting’ winter.

In light of the useful nature of the much maligned Woolly Booger, I hereby name Representative Key, Reynolds, Ritze and any others who expressed their concern about the ramifications of this and similar measures, Honorary Woolly Boogers for their reliable forecasting as to the weather that lies ahead for the people of this state.  Well Done!

****Last comment***Under irony, a publication like this one
intended for companies that intend to make a fortune by siphoning off our personal data for profit issuing this disclaimer might suffice.  From now on, I’m going to using it for my own.  Just substitute “person” for “publication” and you are set!

© 2002 Smart Card News Ltd., Brighton, England. No part of this publication  person may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, optical, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publishers.