Tulsa Beacon: City of Norman Tactically Employs Ridicule to Sway Opinions

Kaye Beach

June 22, 2012

This article was published June 20 th in the Tulsa Beacon.  The author if the article is Randy W.  Bright, AIA, NCARB, a well respected Tulsa architect.

Bright immediately picks up on the the shaming tactics employed by the City of Norman in their framing of the the issue which is supposed to be about whether or not to allow high density development however the scheduling of six facilitated “community  discussions” on the issue plus the bent of the City’s presentation indicates that there is more to all of this than meets the eye.

The residents of the City of Norman are, once again, being ‘framed’.  As if we are children, the City will walk us through their ‘charettes’ (really charades!) and lead us to an outcome that limits our choices and further compromises our property rights.  Then,  we will be told that this is what we said we wanted.

Can we not build communities without over-regulation?

by Randy Bright

I don’t read Cosmopolitan, and never have, but when I’m in the supermarket checkout line and see the magazine I think about a story that came out several years ago about how they get the cover photo shot. The girl on the cover always looks perfect, but if you could get her to turn around, her clothing is pulled tightly to her body with dozens of clamps, pins and safety pins.
Sometimes perfection just isn’t what it seems.
Administrators in Norman, Okla., recently began the process of introducing the idea that form-based codes, Smart Growth, and high-density development are what their city needs.
According to an article by researcher Kaye Beach (axxiomamuse.wordpress.com), the city is holding meetings to see if they should codify high-density development.
The facilitated meeting began with a Power Point presentation explaining what Smart Growth and New Urbanism was, and how they related to dense developments.
Things became more clear when a slide entitled, “Pros and Cons of Density” was shown. It said, “It is promoted by those who value urban streetscapes, efficient infrastructure supply, walkable neighborhoods, and increased housing options.

Increased density is opposed by those who imagine ugly buildings, overshadowed open space, parking problems and irresponsible residents.”
In other words, those in favor of density have values, those who do not are ignorant and uninformed. Even if I did not already know about form-based codes and high-density development, I am always suspicious when ridicule is used to sway people. After all, who wants to be identified with the ignorant and uninformed?

Read the entire article here

About these ads

7 responses to “Tulsa Beacon: City of Norman Tactically Employs Ridicule to Sway Opinions

  1. Richard Harris

    Agenda 21 in disguise. Wake up Norman. Your city leaders are buying into the U.N.’s sustainable developement slavery concept.

  2. That was a very good smack down…

  3. I grew up in the foothills of Northern California. I hadn’t been back home in 2 decades. When I did go back home, the town I grew up in was unrecognizeable. The old homes and businesses I frequented back in the late 60’s, early 70’s were gone! I didn’t even know my way around things had changed so drastically. The uniqueness of the homes and businesses had been replaced with the sameness that exists now all over the towns of Loomis, Rocklin, Roseville, and Lincoln. A person does not know when they are leaving one of those towns, and entering another. The businesses and homes are all the same color, light brown, nondescript. I didn’t like what I saw, and I wonder if the residents had a say in the decision to destroy the uniqueness of the areas.

  4. They only had a limited say… Here is what ya wanted… Sad.

  5. Talk about ulterior motives… I bet the City of Norman is not disclosing how much matching federal and/or international funds the city of Norman stands to gain if they pass such planning regulations and codes for high density “walk only” housing development…

    For the real story about the fallacy of Smart Development and Sustainable Growth, and how it will effect our future path to socialism enforced by tyranny, visit this website: http://www.freedomadvocates.org/articles/planning_-_smart_growth

  6. Norman Sucks

    You guys can’t expect Norman to wake up, get some insight, develop any understanding, etc. The majority there are a bunch of egghead intellectuals who pride themselves on how narrowminded they are in their liberality and belief in government encroachment. Leopards don’t change their spots, no matter how much coaxing.

  7. Pingback: City of Norman’s Fifth Density Dialog Charade | AxXiom for Liberty

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s