AxXiom for Liberty

Entries categorized as ‘Uncategorized’

Fusion center data consolidation effort failing, Texas seeks public input

December 3, 2009 · Leave a Comment

 

For OpEdNews: Sheila Dean – Writer

c/o ConstitutionCampaign.org

Since the passage of the PATRIOT Act, pervasive citizen surveillance and data collection have been combined as part of an ambitious effort to coordinate national security efforts. Many state governments are in the process of developing warehouses for private and public information in centralized digital hubs called fusion centers, over 70 of which have already been established around the country.

One fusion center of considerable size and concern is the North Central Texas Fusion Center (NCTFS). According the NCTFS, their fusion system user base has expanded to 125 North Central Texas agencies and a centralized hub located in Austin with access to 90 million database records, including open source data. The fusion center intends to allow national security employees to access their user base from remote locations.

According to an ACLU report:

The types of information they seek for analysis has also broadened over time to include not just criminal intelligence, but public and private sector data, and participation in these centers has grown to include not just law enforcement, but other government entities, the military and even select members of the private sector.

Moreover, there are serious questions about whether data fusion is an effective means of preventing terrorism in the first place, and whether funding the development of these centers is a wise investment of finite public safety resources. Yet federal, state and local governments are increasing their investment in fusion centers without properly assessing whether they serve a necessary purpose.

The Texas Department of Information Resources (DIR) is one agency currently responsible for consolidating data from all Texas State agencies into one digital location. The DIR’s consultants, EquaTerra, recently found major defects with IBM’s performance towards the consolidation. One original intention was to save the state money by simply streamlining the data into one location, but it seems IBM has proven unable to fulfill the terms of its contract.

While it is not clear how the information will continue to be used, stored, managed, or disseminated, it is clear that the project is failing standards of efficiency and the flailing project is now costing taxpayers $863 million.

In an effort to solve the problem, the DIR recently decided to reach out to the public for comment. Texans are now being asked to offer input to determine whether moving forward with the data consolidation effort is in their best interests. Texans concerned with the continuance of local fusion center data aggregation should contact the following State officials to document their input:

Governor Rick Perry Advisor to Department of Information Resources ATTN: Ed Robertson ed.robertson@governor.state.tx.us Phone: (512) 463-1782

DIR Public Information Office ATTN: Thomas Johnson P.O. Box 13564 Austin, TX 78711-3564 Fax: (800) 464-1218 Phone: (512) 936-6592

The Peoples’ Campaign for the Constitution’s legal professionals affinity group is pursuing a systematic investigation of fusion centers around the country, with the assistance of lawyers, law students, and paralegals volunteering their time to (a) submit Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests (a model of which has been developed by students at Yale Law School), (b) litigate potential refusals by state governments to disclose requested documents, and/or (c) review responsive documents through a decentralized online process.

If you are a lawyer, law student, or paralegal willing to volunteer time for citizen oversight of domestic spying, please sign up for our legal professionals group and we’ll be in touch.

 
 

Take action — click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Texans tell DIR to opt out of Agency Fusion Center

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Fusion-center-data-consoli-by-Sheila-Dean-091124-532.html

 

 

Sheila Dean is the blog editor for BeatTheChip.org and presides over the 5-11 Campaign, an anti-national ID advocacy group.


Keep up with Sheila at www.beatthechip.org

 


 

Categories: Uncategorized

Ex-Oklahoma County jail guard pleads guilty in abuse

December 3, 2009 · Leave a Comment


Ex-Oklahoma County jail guard pleads guilty in abuse
Man faced reduced misdemeanor charge of violating county jail inmate’s civil rights

BY NOLAN CLAY

Published: December 3, 2009

Christopher Beckman, 34. The inmate died after a struggle with guards at the Oklahoma County jail in 2007.


A fired guard once blamed in a felony charge for an Oklahoma County jail inmate’s death pleaded guilty Wednesday to a misdemeanor instead.


Justin Mark Isch The former Oklahoma County jail guard pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of violating an inmate’s civil rights.

35.4696 -97.5257


Justin Mark Isch, 22, of Edmond, faces up to a year in federal prison when he is sentenced in a few months.

Another fired guard, Gavin Douglas Littlejohn, 26, of Oklahoma City, still faces trial Monday on the felony charge. Prosecutors on Tuesday revealed they have a secret recording of Littlejohn admitting to hitting the inmate.

A third former guard, William Ira Hathorn, 29, of Oklahoma City, pleaded guilty Wednesday to lying to investigators about the inmate’s death. Hathorn faces up to three years in federal prison.

Isch and Littlejohn were fired from the Oklahoma County sheriff’s office Feb. 2 after a federal grand jury indicted them over the inmate’s death. Grand jurors alleged the two violated the inmate’s civil rights on May 26, 2007, by using so much excessive force that the inmate died.

Defense attorney Mack Martin said prosecutors reduced the civil rights violation against Isch to a misdemeanor after determining through further investigation that his conduct was not “in any way” to blame for the death.

The inmate, Christopher Beckman, 34, of Choctaw, died May 28, 2007, two days after struggling with guards. The struggle began after he reportedly had seizures in his cell. He had been arrested on complaints of driving under the influence, driving under suspension, two counts of drug possession and failure to show insurance verification.

An autopsy concluded Beckman died from blunt force head trauma severe enough to cause brain swelling.


Read more:
http://newsok.com/ex-oklahoma-county-jail-guard-pleads-guilty-in-abuse/article/3422149#ixzz0YgIFuVRt

Ed Geary’s Legal Blog

Oklahoma Jail Guards Charged with Murder – Homicide

The indictment claims Isch used Beckman’s heat to open a steel door and Littlejohn repeatedly struck Beckman about the head and face.  The Oklahoma County Sheriff fired both men when the indictment was unsealed.  The Sheriff’s office issued a statement that read, “The OCSO is disappointed that these two former employees have found themselves in this situation.”

Notice how that statement puts a distance between the Sheriff and these two employees now as “former employees?”  They were certainly employees at the time of the death.  And notice the use of the passive voice about the men “finding themselves in this situation?   No mention of any wrongdoing, alleged or otherwise.  No mention of regretting the death, much less the alleged act of murder.  No mention that still another person has had his life taken while in the custody of the Oklahoma County Sheriff, this one making it more than 40 in number since January 2000.  No wonder the federal government moved all its prisoners out of that jail.

Christopher Beckman died May 28, 2007, at St. Anthony’s Hospital.  The state medical examiner’s office reported the death as a homicide in June, 2008, and the indictment followed eight months later. Defendants Isch and Littlejohn have not yet come to trial on the indictment.

At the time of the death, sheriff’s spokesman Mark Myers claimed Beckman suffered his injuries during a seizure while being transferred from his cell to a medical wing. Myers said he was being taken from the second floor to the first “when he fell face first to the floor and began convulsing.”  Then, Myers claimed, Beckman became “combative with officers at that point and suffered several cuts to his face.”  Myers said there was a video recording of the incident and said “at no time is there any evidence that any detention officers struck the victim.”

Obviously the Sheriff’s complete denial at the time of death was not enough to overcome the medical examiner’s report that concluded there was no possible way the victim could have died from anything but a homicide.  Obviously, the United States Attorney believed the medical examiner rather than the Sheriff.

read more;

http://edmondgeary.wordpress.com/2009/07/22/oklahoma-jail-guards-charged-with-murder-homicide/


Categories: Jails/Prison · police brutality
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Oklahoma New counter-terrorism unit fuses state intel

December 3, 2009 · Leave a Comment

New counter-terrorism unit fuses state intel

Dec 02. 2009

Mark Schlachtenhaufen
The Edmond Sun

EDMOND — A new state information-sharing unit is helping combat domestic terrorism, a slightly greater concern than foreign-based threats, a state official said.

Fusion centers were started in an attempt to break down barriers in the exchange of information between U.S. agencies. However, some critics contend that they are potential vehicles for abuse of civil liberties and personal privacy.

State Sen. Steve Russell, R-Oklahoma City, vice chairman of the Senate’s Public Safety and Homeland Security Committee, said he is not aware of any evidence of such abuses by the Oklahoma Information Fusion Center, operational since May 2008 under the OSBI.

Russell said like many Oklahomans he understands the privacy concerns about intelligence sharing, which must be balanced against the realities of living in a post-Sept. 11, 2001, post-Oklahoma City bombing world.

“Oklahoma is ahead of a lot of states,” Russell said. “We recognize this is a real possibility domestically or internationally.”

In 2004 and 2005, many states began creating fusion centers with various local, state and federal funds.

The development of guidelines for fusion centers was separated into three phases — law enforcement intelligence, public safety and the private sector, according to a fusion center guideline fact sheet. The guidelines were to be used for homeland security efforts as well as all crimes.

Read More;

http://www.edmondsun.com/local/local_story_336234703.html

Oklahoma Information Fusion Center

“Prevention Through Awareness”

The Oklahoma Information Fusion Center is the focal point for the collection, assessment, analysis and dissemination of terrorism and crime prevention information. Through partnerships with the public, private industry, public safety agencies and law enforcement, the fusion center works to protect Oklahoma

Categories: Uncategorized

InsureNet Lobbyist presses fiscal case for DMV contract

December 2, 2009 · Leave a Comment

The LAS VEGAS SUN

THE LEGISLATURE:

Lobbyist presses fiscal case for DMV contract

By David McGrath Schwartz (contact)

Thursday, May 7, 2009 | 2 a.m.

Sun Archives

Carson City — Former Assembly speaker and current lobbyist Richard Perkins said the state could make more than $100 million a year in higher fees and added insurance premiums if the Legislature requires it to hire a company to automatically verify vehicle insurance coverage.

Perkins acknowledged before the committee that only Michigan-based InsureNet, which has hired Perkins as its lobbyist, qualifies for the contract under Assembly Bill 504. It is the only company that meets the strict requirements of a law enforcement organization, he said.

But, Perkins said, the Assembly committee could prevent the state from “giving away the store” in a contract with InsureNet by putting conditions or limits on how much the company could make under the contract.

AB504 would require the Department of Motor Vehicles to contract with a third party to automatically verify which vehicles are insured.

Perkins told lawmakers InsureNet would set up cameras around the state to photograph the license plates of passing vehicles. The plates would be checked against insurance company databases and when an uninsured vehicle is spotted, a citation would be issued to its registered owner.

Law enforcement would also be able to check in real time which drivers are uninsured, even out-of-state drivers.

“You’ve all heard deals that are too good to be true as I did when I sat on this committee for 14 years,” Perkins told the Assembly Ways and Means Committee. “So how can that be so?”

He said the company would pay for “millions of dollars in upfront costs” to establish the program and in exchange would get a percentage of citations issued through use of the technology.

“Clearly, you could put parameters on what the percentages could be, so you’re not quote-unquote giving away the store,” he said.

DMV Director Edgar Roberts expressed concern that the bill would circumvent laws requiring bids to be open to many potential contractors.

Dennis Colling, the DMV’s chief of administrative services, said “a single company that qualifies is certainly negotiating from a position of power.”

Only Assemblyman Joe Hogan, D-Las Vegas, expressed concern about potential problems the state could encounter negotiating with a company it’s required by law to hire.

“I want to make sure we’re not overpaying or, heaven forbid, underpaying for the contract,” he said. “I’m intrigued, this is an exciting process. But it’s going so fast, I’d like a little more time.”

The bill was not voted on Wednesday.

http://beta-www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/may/07/lobbyist-presses-fiscal-case-dmv-contract/

Categories: Uncategorized

InsurNet Bills Traffic cameras as answer to Chicago’s budget deficit

December 2, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Traffic cameras billed as answer to Chicago’s budget deficit

Red-light cameras have been combined with short yellow lights to catch drivers and raise city revenues across the country. Now an insurance-checking camera company has presented Chicago with a new twist on the idea—instead of speeders, go after the uninsured.

By Joel Hruska | Last updated March 17, 2009 11:30 PM

The Windy City, like a lot of other metropolitan areas of late, is facing major budget deficits in the face of the recession’s strong bite. State and local governments alike have been hunting for additional sources of revenue, so it’s not surprising that a Chicago alderman would entertain the possibility of installing red light cameras along the city’s major thoroughfares and intersections. This time around, though, the company trumpeting the addition of these digital watchdogs isn’t portraying them as useful tools for catching speeders—instead, camera provider InsureNet claims to have developed “a simple yet complete answer that delivers totally accurate, instant insurance status verification. An additional unique advantage is that this system is also non-invasive, ensuring protection for every insurer and policyholder.”

The Chicago Sun-Times
quotes InsureNet president Dr. Jonathan Miller on what the city might expect to earn with the system in 2009. “Certainly, it will be well in excess of $100 million,” Dr. Miller said. “We think at least $200 million. And the upward projections are far higher.” InsureNet would charge a collection fee of “just” 30 percent in exchange for its services. Clearly, this type of system—installed at no small cost—is all about making money.

InsureNet’s website and supporting documents (PDF) are so thickly slathered with PR frosting  that it’s hard to ascertain how the company’s system actually works. Sweeping statements are a way of life; the InsureNet system “addresses all problems…stream(lines) the entire vehicle insurance process…provides dramatic benefits…saves and provides the average State Government with hundreds of millions of dollars annually and saves the Insurance Industry even more.” But wait, there’s MORE:

InsureNet is provided free of charge to law enforcement agencies, private residents, and vehicle insurers, 24/7/365. The National Law Enforcement Communication System (NLETS) it uses has never been compromised, the company assures us, and the entire InsureNet system actually lets insurance companies do less than they do now. Finally, if you haven’t had enough by now, InsureNet is safer, “totally accurate,” and provides all parties “with reliable, automatic, and totally safe data which is completely free of all personal details.” Got all that?

Even if we assume that InsureNet’s database and citation system works well and accept the company’s allegation that nearly one-in-four drivers on the road is uninsured (the Insurance Research Council, or IRC, estimates the rate may hit one-in-six by 2010), there are serious questions to consider when evaluating who, exactly, is going to pay the city of Chicago the several hundred million that Dr. Miller is dangling in front of the cash-strapped aldermen.

In a recent report (PDF), the IRC wrote that it “found a strong correlation between the percent of uninsured motorists and the unemployment rate: An increase in the unemployment rate of one percentage point is associated with an increase in the uninsured motorist rate of more than three-quarters of a percentage point.”

It’s not hard to connect the dots on this one. If unemployed workers are the most likely to cancel their insurance, and InsureNet’s system targets the uninsured, than the city of Chicago would, in effect, be balancing the books on the shoulders of those least able to afford it. Indeed, the city could find itself confronting a virtual mob of angry citizens who are funding social services and unemployment benefits out of their own unemployment checks. http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/03/traffic-cameras-billed-as-answer-to-chicagos-budget-deficit.ars

Related posts;

Oklahoma

Lawmaker Opposes Plan to Use Cameras to Ticket Uninsured Drivers

Categories: Corporate Lobby · Oklahoma State Government · Photo Enforcement · Traffic Safety · Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Lawmaker Opposes Plan to Use Cameras to Ticket Uninsured Drivers

November 30, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Posted: Nov 30, 2009 3:54 PMUpdated: Nov 30, 2009 7:29 PM

Featured Video

The Department of Public Safety is considering using cameras on roadways to help regulate the number of drivers without insurance.

Enlarge this picture

The Department of Public Safety is considering using cameras on roadways to help regulate the number of drivers without insurance.
About 200 cameras would be placed around the state's roads.

Enlarge this picture

About 200 cameras would be placed around the state’s roads.
Cameras would randomly scan the bar code on car tags to identify uninsured drivers.

Enlarge this picture

Cameras would randomly scan the bar code on car tags to identify uninsured drivers.

By Charles Bassett, NEWS 9

OKLAHOMA CITY – A state lawmaker is speaking out against a proposal to use cameras to catch motorist who drive without insurance.

The Department of Public Safety is considering putting up 200 cameras on roadways throughout the state to crack down on drivers without insurance. The cameras would randomly scan the bar code on car tags. If the car comes back uninsured, the driver would be mailed a ticket.

The system would be an upgrade to the state’s electronic insurance verification system.

http://www.newson6.com/Global/story.asp?S=11593542

Categories: Uncategorized

Oklahoma City police use stricter criteria to ID gang members

November 30, 2009 · Leave a Comment

BY MICHAEL MCNUTT   

Published: November 29, 2009

Oklahoma City police officers are using a more precise and uniform gauge of identifying members of criminal street gangs.

Officers recently completed filtering through names of suspected gang members and used criteria from a national database to identify them as being criminal gang members, said police Capt. Pat Byrne.

Officers are using criteria developed by the Violent Gang and Terrorist Organizations File, which is a part of the National Crime Information Center. It serves to identify known members of violent gangs and terrorist organizations.

 

What comes to mind when you think “Gang Member”?


 


. . . Or maybe this?


 

The article continues. .

Gang members have to meet certain elements, such as admitting while under arrest their membership in a gang, to get on the list. Or, they must meet three factors, such as wearing certain colors, clothing or jewelry, having certain tattoos or displaying certain hand signals or graffiti.

“What it does, it takes away the ability to be tagged as a gang member for having a pair of saggy pants,” Byrne said.



Read more:
http://newsok.com/oklahoma-city-police-use-stricter-criteria-to-id-gang-members/article/3421200?custom_click=headlines_widget#ixzz0YHKHi1YT

 

 

 

November 13, 2003

Testimony of Michael D. Kirkpatrick, Assistant Director in Charge, Criminal Justice Information Services Division, FBI

 

The FBI’s CJIS Division implemented the NCIC Violent Gang and Terrorist Organization File or “VGTOF” in December 1994. This file is designed to provide identifying information about violent criminal gang and terrorist organization members to protect the law enforcement community and the public.

 

. During security preparations for the 2002 Winter Olympic Games in Salt Lake City, Utah, the FBI determined that it would be advisable to have individuals of FBI domestic or international terrorism investigative interest included in VGTOF

. “Traditionally, NCIC person records serve the needs of the criminal justice community and are supported by the judicial process.”

 

But with the creation of VGTOF, that philosophy was expanded to support law enforcement investigative and information needs related to terrorism. The terrorist records, in particular, support national security and homeland security. Based on the positive results during the Olympics, the FBI has continued to make this terrorism information available to the criminal justice community and has enhanced VGTOF to better support these records.

 

Additionally, the FBI has coordinated with other entities to include their terrorist subject records in VGTOF with the goal of developing a centralized terrorist watch list.

 

The newly created Terrorist Screening Center will use the NCIC VGTOF as part of its daily operations.

 

http://www.fbi.gov/congress/congress03/ncic111303.htm

 

 

2003 was the same year that the DoJ exempted NCIC from the Privacy Act of 1974 which requires record accuracy and accountability

 

 

A federal audit of VGTOF in 2005 found an error rate of 40 percent based on a small sample of records. Are you on the VGTOF list?

http://www.reclaimdemocracy.org/articles/2007/government_watch_lists.php

 

 

audit report-

http://www.justice.gov/oig/reports/FBI/a0527/chapter7.htm

 

2007 follow up report

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/06/AR2007090601386.html

 

 

You may not picture someone that looks like this

Bill Sulzman

Colorado Springs peace activist Bill Sulzman is apparently listed in VGTOF as a “terrorist,” according to an article in the Colorado Springs Independent.

 

“Extremists” listed in FBI’s Violent Gang and Terrorist Organization File
In anticipation of the 2002 Olympics, the Joint Terrorism Task Force added “anarchists” and eight separate categories of “extremists” (such as “environmental extremist” and “Black extremist”) to the FBI’s computer database known as the Violent Gang and Terrorist Organization File (VGTOF). When patrol officers routinely check the name of a driver or a suspect in the computer of the National Crime Information Center (NCIC), the VGTOF database is automatically searched, too. A patrol officer who encounters a VGTOF “hit” is expected to notify the FBI

FBI Memo re Violent Gang and Terrorist Organization File (VGTOF)

 

“License and registration, please?” The officer stands beside your car. Behind you, his cruiser lights are flashing. Other motorists slow down to gawk. Your heart pounds.

“What have I done?” you ask. The officer explains that you ran a stop sign several blocks back. You never saw the sign, but no matter. It will be a small fine and off you will go. Everyone makes simple mistakes from time to time.

The officer takes your license and registration to his car. He enters your name into a database linked to his car by computer. A message flashes across his screen:

WARNING – APPROACH WITH CAUTION

THIS INDIVIDUAL IS ASSOCIATED WITH TERRORISM …

USE CAUTION AND IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE TERRORIST SCREENING CENTER AT (866) 872-9001 FOR ADDITIONAL DIRECTION.

Your plans for the evening have changed. You are now on the federal radar, listed and tagged as a potential threat. Your name is part of the FBI’s Violent Gang and Terrorist Organization File (VGTOF). Will you go home, or to a jail cell?

How did your name get on the list? You don’t know. You may never know. Perhaps you were seen at an antiwar rally. Or perhaps you contributed money to a candidate or cause that some anonymous soul views as suspect. Like it or not, however, every law enforcement officer in the country now need only log onto his computer to learn that you are a suspect.
http://www.reclaimdemocracy.org/articles/2007/government_watch_lists.php

 

Another thing to think about regarding “watchlists”, saggy pants aside.

The VGTOF and the Second Amendment

No Fly, No Buy-NO DUE Process

davekopel.org/2A/Mags/No-Fly-No-Buy.pdf

AxXiom


 

Categories: Uncategorized

Oklahoma City ‘We Are Change-OK’ activists assaulted and arrested during action at mall / RedDirtReport.com

November 29, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Oklahoma City ‘We Are Change-OK’ activists assaulted and arrested during action at mall / RedDirtReport.com

James Lane, founder of We Are Change Oklahoma shares his story with Red Dirt Report and Oklahoma Watchdog.
http://www.reddirtreport.com/news.php?id=13493

Categories: Uncategorized

Woolly Boogers Loose in the Oklahoma State House? Online insurance verification bill

November 28, 2009 · 1 Comment

11/27/09

In light of today news, I thought “Woolly Boogers” was worthy of reposting.

Oklahoma could keep an eye on uninsured motorists
Read more:
http://newsok.com/oklahoma-could-keep-an-eye-on-uninsured-motorists/article/3420697?custom_click=lead_story_title#ixzz0Y8L9yIFW

 

 

 

 

Original Post Feb, 23, 2009

WOOLLY BOOGERS

In the Oklahoma State House?

What in the heck is a woolly booger?


A Real Live Woolly Booger

“In truth, they are the larvae of the Spotted Tussock Moth. More night fliers. Just what we need around here.”

Always Trust a Woolly Booger

Woolly Boogers are quite useful. People have their long-range forecasting models and their Doppler radars, learned meteorologists, and all sorts of ‘equipment’ to forecast the weather. With all that equipment, one would think they’d have the weather pegged, wouldn’t one? But, no, most of the time they say it will do one thing and it actually does quite another.

Goats, on the other hand, have a much more sophisticated and reliable means of predicting the weather. At least in the case of the winter weather. You see, the way it works is that in the Fall if one notices many Wooly Boogers crawling about , resting on latches, falling in the water tub, crawling up the side of the barn, or residing on that dried leaf you had your eye on from way across the pasture, it means we are going to have an ‘exciting’ winter.

In light of the useful nature of the much maligned Woolly Booger, I hereby name Representative Key, Reynolds, Ritze and any others who expressed their concern about the ramifications of this and similar measures, Honorary Woolly Boogers for their reliable forecasting as to the weather that lies ahead for the people of this state.  Well Done! 2/23/09

 

 

 Now we know what a woolly booger is.

That technical lingo that those highfalutin’ lawmakers use makes me feel so uneducated!

Woolly boogers and conspiracy theories are the terms used by Rep. Ken Miller (kenmiller@okhouse.gov (405) 557-7360) to characterize some House members and their concerns about HB2013.

Miller offers that he helped install a GPS device on a friend’s car and that it had nothing to do with a bar code (??) He says that the barcode on our new license plates are “empty” and he has bar codes on his groceries and  of the concerns raised, Miller says that he heard a lot of things that “Frankly just don’t concern me at all,(snicker)” (30:55 on audio)

 

Bar Code! We Don’t Need No Stinking Bar Codes!


 

The audio file can be accessed here
http://www.lsb.state.ok.us/
select the date, Feb 19th then select track # 1008 (HB2013) to listen.

Go to 19:50 time on the audio file to get to the interesting part, the debate.  The previous 19 minutes consists of Rep. Miller presenting bill 2013, ostensibly a bill designed to clean up the language of an earlier bill regarding insurance verification for motorists passed 1 or 2 years ago.  *Yawn* And questions from Rep. Ritze, Rep. Key and Rep. Reynolds and Rep. Morrissette regarding the following  opics

(note: I am paraphrasing the exchange)

*Is the bill a “requested bill”   and who requested it?

Rep. Miller answers that, Yes. It was requested by DPS, the OK. Tax Commission, the  OK.Insurance Department and “Industry” (
Which refers to InsureNet.)

*Why was the deadline for implementing the original bill (July 1 2008)  missed?

Miller said some small companies had not achieved compliance due to not reporting properly.

Listen from 2:55 to 4:55 for Rep. Miller’s too-twisty-to-type reply when asked to name what small insurance company was out of compliance and why by Reynolds.

See this newsarticle dated Dec. 29, 2008

Oklahoma Electronic Insurance Verification System Not Reliable Yet

Excerpt:

A new electronic system to verify automobile insurance in Oklahoma is operational, but not yet reliable.

A law passed in 2006 takes effect Jan. 1, 2009, allowing law enforcement agencies and tag agents to check for up-to-date automobile insurance electronically through a database maintained by the Department of Public Safety.

The system is in place, but testing shows it is accurate only 60 percent of the time, Oklahoma Tax Commission officials said.

Because of that, law enforcement officials and tag agents are being told not to rely on the information it provides, said David Beatty, the department’s project manager for the Oklahoma Compulsory Insurance Verification System.. . .

http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/southcentral/2008/12/29/96625.htm

*Had there been discussion between involved parties and InsureNet and is the new or altered language the result of that communication.

Miller said (paraphrasing) that Yes.  There had been communication and while InsureNet submitted suggestions, none of their language was used.

Rep. Key expressed concern over system glitches that might show a motorist is uninsured when, in fact they are and then their car is impounded disrupting the person’s livelihood.

Rep. Ritze at 11:16 asks if this is a proposed online database shared with DPS and had DPS’s database ever been hacked or breached. (Later it is revealed by Reynolds that, in fact DPS computer database security was recently was breached.  I have not located a news story on this but will find out more.)

UPDATED

Breach puts information in peril

http://newsok.com/article/3110406/1187986334

August 25, 2007

Someone hacked into computers at three Oklahoma law enforcement agencies and may have stolen private information meant only for police use, the state Department of Public Safety announced Friday”

The breach involved information used by the Oklahoma Law Enforcement Telecommunications System, (OLETS)a statewide computer network used by dispatchers to obtain instant access to all types of local, state and federal law enforcement databases.
Police dispatchers typically use the system to verify the status of driver licenses, vehicle registration and to check for outstanding warrants and criminal history

Any information accessed by dispatchers that was displayed on their computer screen may have been sent to a third party by a computer virus found on the three affected computers. Both driver license numbers and Social Security numbers are listed in the database along with names and addresses, Thaxton said

How it happened
The security breach was the first discovered in the computer network, which has been in use since 1986. West said computers law enforcement agencies use for the Oklahoma Law Enforcement Telecommunications System  (OLETS, OK Nlets)often serve a variety of other functions, including unrestricted Internet access.

Also SEE InsureNet False Claims

Rep Miller states he had no idea and continually reintegrates that the intent of HB2013 is simply to “clean up language.”

*Had there been discussion between involved parties and InsureNet and is the new or altered language the result of that communication.

(15:50) Miller said (paraphrasing) that, “Yes,” there had been communication and while InsureNet submitted suggestions, none of their language was used.

Reynolds asked what would be InsureNet’s interest in changes.  Miller says because they (InsureNet) would like to be the carrier.

I’m sure you are catching the drift of this back and forth by this point so I’ll skip any further blow by blow.

The audio file can be accessed at
http://www.lsb.state.ok.us/ . Select the date, Feb 19th then select track # 1008 (HB2013)to listen.

At 30:47 you can hear Rep. Miller speak to the issue of “woolly boogers.”

So, I began to tear up the web searching for info that will illuminate this issue.  Are private companies driving legislation in our state, promising heaps of revenue to other companies (in this case insurance) and to state agencies and is this revenue to be ill-gotten by devising more and more intrusive ways of “catching” us?  Is this what is driving the apparent burning need for umpteen plus forty databases all interconnected, gleaning every smidge of personal, biographical and biometric info possible AND hooking our virtual selves up with foreign countries?  From my scrutiny of AAMVA, the reigning masters of private industry driving legislation for the sole purpose of endlessly milking the American people, the ultimate cash cow for these companies, I’s say at the very least we ought to look into this.  I can say with all certainty that AAMVA works exactly this way and I am sure they are spreading the good news to all of their associates.  This is NOT good old privatization!  This is Public Private Partnerships or PPP’s. You would not want to confuse the two ideas because they don’t remotely work the same.  Public Private Partnerships make deals with governmental agencies so that they have the benefit of government taxing and enforcement to secure their companies fortune.  These companies present their wares showcasing how it will bring in heaps of revenue to the government.  They help to create laws and policies to justify and implement schemes that support these products.  In a nutshell, what we get is corporate government.  Not government by and for and of the people.  This was the genesis of Real ID.

Here is a good explanation of why Public Private Partnerships should not be equated with the simple notion of privatization, which we associate with smaller government and more efficiency.

Excerpt:

It is little understood by the general public how public/private partnerships can be used, not as a way to diminish the size of government, but in fact, to increase government’s power.

Slowly, the whole comes together. By the time people realize the truth, it’s already in place. Policy is set. [. . . ]

And Public/Private Partnerships are becoming the fastest growing process to impose such policy. State legislatures across the nation are passing legislation, which calls for the implementation of PPPs.

Beware. These bonds between government and private international corporations are a double-edged sword. They come armed with government’s power to tax, the government’s power to enforce policy and the government’s power to enforce eminent domain.

At the same time, the private corporations use their wealth and extensive advertising budgets to entrench the policy into our national conscience. Cute little jingles or emotional commercials can be very useful tools to sell a government program.

http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/deweese081507.htm

How about InsureNet?

Well, InsureNet is an associate of AAMVA.  Judging from the 35 page long document-who isn’t an associate of AAMVA’s?

Yes, life is good for AAMVA!InsureNet provides the wold’s only accurate and non-invasive vehicle insurance verification system. It embraces all states, every jurisdiction inside each state, every insurer and is intrastate, interstate and
international in operation.
It is currently connected to
every state in the nation and has been recognized as
the national standard for law enforcement.

More on AAMVA:

From the Stop Real ID Coalition blogspot

Aside from First, Fourth and Tenth amendment issues, the Real ID Act has another major downside. DHS has named AAMVA (American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators) the “backbone” of the Real ID Act. AAMVA is an international organization. AAMVA is promoting the Driver’s License Agreement. The agreement calls for the United States, Mexico and Canada to share all drivers’ information stored in each country’s respective DMV databases. Grant money from the federal government has been available to States to participate in the DLA. http://www.aamva.org/aamva/DocumentDisplay.aspx?id=%7BC600908E-2538-4135-8166-1B25BB682698%7D This is the precursor to the North American Union otherwise named the Security and Prosperity Partnership. If we want to stop the NAU or SPP we MUST repeal the Real ID Act. I have the actual DLA paperwork. Scary does not do it justice. It threatens State’s rights and U.S. sovereignty.

Then there is
this
article from 2006

Excerpt:

InsureNet has developed and owns a patented automated system and method for providing accurate, on-the-spot insurance status verification by officers responding to the scene of an accident or a routine traffic stop. “The parts are now in place for the first-ever national vehicle insurance verification system that will allow law enforcement to immediately, at the scene, accurately determine the insurance status of a vehicle,” said Nlets’ Executive Director, Steve Correll. “This no-cost service
(Oh, someone will pay.  Guess who?!) by Nlets and InsureNet  intended to enable those who protect our society to do their jobs more effectively and safely.” Securely housed within Nlets’ national data center in Phoenix,

 

OK-SAFE
Inc. asks some very good questions;

-InsureNet or DragNet? Apparently Oklahoma is entertaining ideas of adopting a vehicle surveillance system called InsureNet to target “uninsured vehicles,” and which is linked to such international organizations as AAMVA (model of the REAL ID requirements)

Utilizing ALPR (Automatic License Plate Recognition) cameras and other technology, the system can scan a license plate in 2 seconds and verify if the vehicle is insured or not.  In one 8-hour shift, thousands of unsuspecting drivers could have their vehicle insurance status data checked electronically. (A money maker for the insurance companies and stockholders?)

Calls to Representative Ken Miller about HB 2013
would be in order

-Couple a vehicle surveillance system with the current pending Oklahoma legislation attempting to expand the reasons to collect DNA from Oklahomans, the question has to be asked - just what is going on in Oklahoma?

OK-SAFE, Inc. thanks you for your prompt action on these important topics and, as always, encourages you to “read the bill” before making decisions to support or oppose.

 

Here
is a brochure from 3M on their Digital License Plate System-These are our new plates.

And This One on Electronic Vehicle Registration

Here is some info on ALRP and how it is used.
Source
http://www.comptonasap.com/public_ASAP.pdf

Automatic License Plate Recognition (ALPR) Technology

The ASAP system will utilize “Automatic License Plate Recognition” (ALPR) technology. The ALPR software utilizes advanced optical character recognition (OCR) in order to read and record vehicle license plates in day or night conditions. All vehicle license plates are then automatically run through a “wanted” system. This system will automatically notify the Command Center of any “Hits” and the current location of the vehicle. (emphasis added)

Do we no longer subscribe to the notion of Probable Cause?  I thought that there needed to be a darn good reason to search a person in this country. This IS a
dragnet!

And couple that tech with this tech.

Mobile Wireless Surveillance Cameras

A mobile surveillance camera located in a parked vehicle would replace a traditional surveillance crew. The vehicle would be parked next to targeted locations and monitored via a wireless link. The risk of compromise is minimal since decoy vehicles would appear unoccupied. This system offers a substantial cost savings to the Sheriff’s Department as only one deputy would be needed to conduct surveillance from a safe location versus utilizing a team of deputies in the field.

Fair warning to any who wants to start that “if you aren’t doing anything wrong” line of reasoning-Don’t!  I am not “Human Being Under Glass-a modern art exhibit!   Are we all under suspicion all the time like naughty school children?  And who presumes to monitor us day and night?  Our superiors? Our lords, our masters?  These officials are my peers, my equals-they are public SERVANTS.  They have no right to mass surveil us without suspicion!

But wait, there’s more.

ALPR Equipped Sheriff Radio Cars

The Automatic License Plate Recognition system can be applied to Sheriff radio cars. As the radio car drives throughout its jurisdiction, the ALPR system is continuously reading and checking the license plate of vehicles against a “wanted” list. The ALPR system will automatically notify the deputy of any “hits” it receives such as a stolen vehicle, vehicle wanted for a shooting, etc.

ALPR Equipped Mobile Vans

ALPR technology could also be utilized to equip surveillance vans. The vans would utilize a bank of digital surveillance cameras with nighttime capability and ALPR software. The vans could be utilized in a visible or undercover surveillance mode. The

ALPR vans could be deployed as needed at checkpoints, airports, shipping ports or any other number of special details. The true strengths of these vans would come out when they are deployed on freeway overpasses or freeway on/off ramps throughout Los Angeles County. This can be especially useful when a specific vehicle is being sought

Source link
http://www.comptonasap.com/public_ASAP.pdf

Somebody sure did a good job selling the L.A. County Sheriff’s Department on this setup, I swear I can hear the author breathing hard as I read.

***

I have looked at documents and read up on this issue for the last 20 hours and I will be posting more on what I have found but for the sake of ever getting this posted, I have to stop here.  There is so much to tell yet so little time.

Here is the bottom line as far as I am concerned;

This is just one more avenue leading us to a total surveillance society.

Take a look at this freshly released
Surveillance: Citizens and the State
ordered in 2004 to be undertaken by The House of Lords, UK. On the effects and concerns about the effects on “the impact that government surveillance and data collection have upon the privacy of citizens and their relationship with the State.”

I have yet to read this lengthy report but, I am confident that it will put Rep. Miller’s unbearably witty rhetoric on “conspiracies” and “woolly boogers” firmly into proper context.  Tactics like ridicule are losing sway with the public who is beginning to become familiar enough with the intrusive technologies and schemes already in place to sense and see for themselves the danger inherit in them.

The UK is only a step or two ahead of us and what is taking place there is a harbinger for the US.  I predict that this report marks the beginning of a furious degree of utterly impotent back peddling as the tangible results of this folly become undeniable.

We should take a lesson from our British cousins in this as well as the consequences they suffer from their inclusion into the European Union.  Some things, once established, cannot be undone.

And as for the Woolly Boogers-the
wise goat
tells us just what it is they are good for;

Always Trust a Woolly Booger

Woolly Boogers are quite useful. People have their long-range forecasting models and their Doppler radars, learned meteorologists, and all sorts of ‘equipment’ to forecast the weather. With all that equipment, one would think they’d have the weather pegged, wouldn’t one? But, no, most of the time they say it will do one thing and it actually does quite another.

Goats, on the other hand, have a much more sophisticated and reliable means of predicting the weather. At least in the case of the winter weather. You see, the way it works is that in the Fall if one notices many Wooly Boogers crawling about , resting on latches, falling in the water tub, crawling up the side of the barn, or residing on that dried leaf you had your eye on from way across the pasture, it means we are going to have an ‘exciting’ winter.

In light of the useful nature of the much maligned Woolly Booger, I hereby name Representative Key, Reynolds, Ritze and any others who expressed their concern about the ramifications of this and similar measures, Honorary Woolly Boogers for their reliable forecasting as to the weather that lies ahead for the people of this state.  Well Done!

****Last comment***Under irony, a publication like this one
intended for companies that intend to make a fortune by siphoning off our personal data for profit issuing this disclaimer might suffice.  From now on, I’m going to using it for my own.  Just substitute “person” for “publication” and you are set!

© 2002 Smart Card News Ltd., Brighton, England. No part of this publication  person may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, optical, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publishers.


Categories: Uncategorized

NCIC Error Costs Woman her Job

November 27, 2009 · 1 Comment

www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/carroll/bal-md.studnitz28oct28,0,7830187.story

Fired due to error in background check, Carroll woman still jobless

Bartlett helping in 3-month quest for vindication

By Scott Calvert | scott.calvert@baltsun.com

October 28, 2009


Eschol Amelia Studnitz lost her $58,000 accounting job July 31 because a government background check deemed her “unsuitable” for a low-level security clearance. She was stunned. She had no criminal record.

“I kept thinking, ‘What could I have done?’ ” said the 59-year-old Carroll County resident, who goes by the name Amy.

Her shock was warranted: Her firing was based on a mistake. And within days, her employer, Corporate Mailing Services of Arbutus, heard from the Social Security Administration that she could, in fact, work on a new contract handling mail for the agency.

But three bewildering months after her dismissal, Studnitz has not been rehired or found other work in this tight job market. A single woman who’s relying on her $405 weekly unemployment checks, she says she is behind on the mortgage for her Manchester home and has a shut-off notice from Baltimore Gas and Electric Co.

“I’m in a jam, a real jam,” she said, “and I didn’t do this to myself.” She wants to regain the job she landed in April 2008, but the company now says it won’t rehire her due to supposed performance shortfalls. She would like to sue the government for thousands of dollars of lost income, but could face long odds.

CMS President Stephen Linsenmeyer declined to comment, saying, “We’re still working through this process. It’s unresolved.”

The circumstances of her firing show the impact that database glitches can have in an age when background checks are becoming increasingly common, according to one privacy rights advocate.

“This is a horrible injustice to her,” said Lillie Coney, associate director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington. But Coney said she was not surprised the error involved the FBI’s National Crime Information Center database.

“There have been several well-publicized incidents involving inaccuracies in the NCIC database,” she said, some dating back 20 years. According to online Maryland court records, a nursing home won an $11,676 civil judgment against Studnitz in 2005, but she says that actually involved her late father’s estate. She has no criminal record.

Still, Studnitz appears to have limited legal options, said Marley Weiss, a University of Maryland law professor. CMS has no obligation to rehire her. Nonunion, private-sector workers can be fired for “any reason or no reason,” except for a prohibited basis such as race or age.

A lawsuit against the government would be difficult, she predicted, because public agencies may argue they have immunity from such claims. “Of course,” Weiss said, “there is an extreme sense of unfairness to this.”

The FBI maintains the nationwide NCIC system at a West Virginia facility where information flows in from state, local and federal police agencies.

FBI spokesman Stephen G. Fischer Jr. said he could not explain the error or say how often mistakes occur. A data quality review process helps with accuracy, he said, “but we do not maintain or track an error rate.”

Social Security officials say it bears no blame for Studnitz’s experience. “Obviously, it’s a horrible situation for her, but we’re kind of caught in the middle,” said spokesman Mark Hinkle.

Hinkle said Social Security relies on NCIC data for its preliminary reviews. He also said while Social Security requires anyone working on an agency contract to have clearance, companies are not mandated to fire employees who flunk background checks.

For Studnitz, that initial NCIC check tipped the first of several dominoes in an ordeal that has left her feeling rattled.

“I’ve never been let go, for one thing,” she said in an interview. “And to be let go with a callous attitude. I was a good employee. [CMS] just completely wrote me off like a bad seed. It was surreal.”

The timing was terrible. Ten days earlier, she had used $5,000 in savings toward buying a car, and the $400 payments have deepened her money problems.

Studnitz learned of her firing from a human resources consultant the afternoon of July 31, a Friday. The consultant had no answers and gave her a letter from CMS’ general manager, Michael J. DeMos. The letter noted that, since the firm had recently won a contract to handle mail for Social Security, all employees at CMS’ facility needed a Level 1 security clearance.

“We have been informed by the SSA that your background investigation was returned as ‘unsuitable,’ ” he wrote. He did not explain why she was unsuitable, just that she was being fired.

“Are you crazy?” Studnitz recalls telling the human resources official. She was given a few minutes to tidy up and leave.

Enclosed in her termination packet was the July 23 letter from Social Security that informed the company of her “unsuitable” status. Studnitz wonders why she was not told until more than a week later; she might have been able to clarify the error and save her job.

On Aug. 11, Social Security wrote a follow-up letter to CMS. It said “a favorable pre-screening for suitability” was done on Studnitz. It did not mention the earlier “unsuitable” finding. The revision meant she could work on the contract, after all, “pending a final suitability determination.”

But by this point, Studnitz had been unemployed for nearly two weeks.

Read More;

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/carroll/bal-md.studnitz28oct28,0,5915936,full.story

Categories: Uncategorized