SB 1102 DNA Harvesting Expansion Bill Signed By OH! Henry

May 22, 2009

The Gov. signed this bill into law.

Violent misdemeanors.  Sure.

How long before the non-DNA databanked are a minority in the US?


relevant- 2010

DNA for Dollars


The state’s inventory of DNA samples could increase under a bill on its way to the governor’s desk.

Senate Bill 1102, which passed the House and Senate, would require DNA sampling from people convicted of certain misdemeanor crimes. The bill also would require DNA samples from people who have been arrested on suspicion they committed a crime and are found to be in the country illegally.

Oklahoma already takes DNA samples from everyone convicted of a felony. The bill goes to Gov. Brad Henry for consideration.

Supporters of the bill say the move would help solve violent crimes, while opponents say taking DNA samples from people convicted of minor crimes is an invasion of privacy.

“I think we’ve gone way too far on taking DNA samples,” Oklahoma County Public Defender Bob Ravitz said. “I think convicted rapists and people convicted of sex crimes should have their DNA tested. A misdemeanor is not serious enough to justify putting someone in the database and spending the money to take their DNA.”

The bill was written by Norman Republican Sen. Jonathan Nichols, a former prosecutor.

“I’ve seen just how extraordinarily helpful DNA is in solving a crime,” Nichols said. “The effect is not always that it puts someone in prison. There have been cases where DNA has proven people’s innocence, as well.”

Nichols was the author of previous legislation to require all convicted felons to submit to DNA testing. DNA testing eventually gave investigators information to solve the 1996 murder of University of Oklahoma ballerina Jewel “Juli” Busken.

Read more;

If a person is convicted of the following misdemeanors, he or she must provide a DNA sample under the

proposed measure. The sample will be kept in a

statewide database.

→Assault and battery

→Domestic abuse


→Possession of controlled substance, schedule IV

→Outraging public decency

→Resisting arrest


→Eluding a police officer

→Peeping Tom

→Pointing a firearm

→Unlawfully carrying firearm

→Illegal transportation of firearm

→Discharging a firearm

→Threatening an act of violence

→Breaking and entering

→Destruction of


→Negligent homicide

→Causing injury while driving under the


Source: Senate Bill 1102

Where are we Heading?

The question was posed in committee to the authors of both SB 1102 and HB 2571,   essentially asking “Where does this end?  Are we going to put everyone in the database?”   The questioners presented this inquiry with some degree of sarcasm, but in truth, that is exactly where we are heading.

Please see; Envisioning the Future of the CODIS DNA Database


“DNA, fingerprints, photos, vehicle registrations, and all other types of data could be linked together in relational databases, so that if I have a DNA profile, I can immediately know your driving record, your military record, a financial profile”

“Those are looking ahead as databases are merged”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s