Pressing Issues About OG&E’s Smart Meter Rollout

Kaye Beach

Dec 27, 2011

 

Over the last few weeks I have been discussing the issues and concerns about OG&E’s smart meter rollout with a gentleman with an extensive background in areas relevant to smart meters/smart grid in order to better understand the technology, specifically the technology being used by OG&E in its implementation of the Positive Energy® Smart Grid program.

This gentleman is an electrical engineer and published author with dozens of patents in digital communications and network storage.  He is the founder, contributor  and executive for multiple hi-tech companies including an internet company and he has decades of service to his credit on National Standards Committees. He does not wish to be personally identified at this time so I will refer to him simply as a “consultant”  Due to the nature of his work, this consultant also has more than a passing familiarity with business law and also  property and intellectual rights which adds considerable dimension to the discussions regarding the smart meter program in Oklahoma.

OG&E’s Positive Energy® Smart Grid program stresses that it is “in partnership” with OG&E’s customers, however, many customers that I have spoken with do not think that they are in any way being treated as “partners” with OG&E.   The reason why is both obvious and likely responsible for much of the ire that has been raised by the installation of smart meters by OG&E-the customer has absolutely no say so in the matter.  There are no options for OG&E customers, they must accept the new meters which enable two way communications between consumer’s meters and the utility.

The authority for mandating the installation of the smart meters, according to Kenneth Grant, Managing Director of Positive Energy® Smart Grid, comes from rules promulgated by the Oklahoma Corporation Commission

TITLE 165: OKLAHOMA CORPORATION COMMISSION

CHAPTER 35. ELECTRIC UTILITY RULES

PERMANENT RULES

AMENDED, EFFECTIVE 7-25-2011

 

I will be posting more information gathered in my correspondence and discussions with my consultant but for now, the basics.

Here is his explanation on how OG&E’s system works followed by what the consultant believes to be the issues of greatest concern.

The network that the utility uses is composed of several layers.  The collection layer is called a “mesh”.  Each meter on each home is both a send and receive radio. 

Your information is broadcast to all of the homes in your surrounding neighborhood for a radius that can sometimes exceed a mile. 

Other homes pick up your information and pass it along.  Multiple homes will receive your information and your home will likewise receive the information from multiple homes.  The intent is to create a redundant “net” of radios that relays information to a central hub, where it eventually is transmitted to the Utility’s central servers over a combination of microwave transmitters and Fiber. 

Every home is required to have a meter that contains a 900 MHz radio and a 2.3GHz radio.  Those radios are always on in listening mode.  OG&E’s implementation will transmit data from each home at least once every 4 hours, and as often as once per hour.

It is not the aims of OG&E that our consultant takes issue with so much as the means in which the utility has chosen to accomplish those aims.

I agree with the ability of the utility to be able to transfer ownership, do load-based billing, pre-paid billing, etc. and to manage their network remotely.  However, the means that OG&E has chosen to employ is invasive and tramples on individual property and privacy rights.

Smart Meters do not have any inherent money or energy saving abilities.  They are touted as being effective due to their ability to help customers monitor their energy usage and make behavioral changes based on that data.  However, as the consultant explains, it is the utilities that are the most obvious beneficiaries of the cost cutting benefits of smart meters.

According to the consultant;  The major advantage of the smart meter is not that it allows customers to save energy – it does not.  It saves the utility millions of dollars in payroll to read meters, it allows them to charge different rates depending on the time of day that electricity is being used, and it allows them to turn meters on and off remotely without a physical visit to the home. . .  It appears that this cost savings is the principle costs savings to the Smart Meter program.

The consultant identifies the following as the most pressing issues and concerns regarding OG&E’s smart meter/grid rollout;

1)       Utility companies are essentially government sponsored monopolies.  In Oklahoma there is oversight by the commission, but the commission operates independently from the legislature.  That allows policy to be made without public review.  I find that to be dangerous.

2)       A consumer needs reasonable property rights to prevent the utility from forcing him/her to submit to RF as a term of service (there are solutions like the one that OEC uses that do not require that)

3)       A consumer should have reasonable rights having to do with the amount of personal information that is transmitted to the utility.  If you are billed once per month, they should only be allowed to read it once per month.  This is a huge privacy issue.  Someone privy to that information can discern a great deal of personal information about the individual.  Primary consideration from a theft perspective is knowledge of whether is someone is normally at home during the day, on vacation, etc.

4)       A consumer should have rights against being into becoming a part of the utility information network.  Current implementation by OG&E as I understand it forces the homeowner to receive and pass along information from other consumers in the area.  That is done without the consumer’s knowledge or consent.  It is like being forced to allow the utility access to your property to read your neighbors meter, or being forced to be a radio transmitter without your consent.

5)       The use of the 900Mhz and 2.4Ghz frequencies for data transmission.  The OG&E meters have radios that are capable of picking up use on those bands.  That information could be used to detect when TV remote controls are being used, garage door openers, internet, cordless phones, and even TV remotes.  That is not the intended use, but the capability exists within the meters.

Essentially, even though every person that uses radio will guarantee that their network and information is safe and invulnerable, the only real way to protect personal information is to not collect it at all.

6)       The meters have the ability to upload new code remotely, so their functionality can be changed at any time by an authorized individual, or potentially by a hacker without the homeowner’s knowledge

In addition, this consultant raises some concerns about the vulnerability of OG&E’s smart meters to electronic attacks.

Are smart meters secure from electronic attacks?

No.  At least not the ones being used by OG&E.   No wireless electronic device can be secure from electronic attacks.  Just as no mechanical device can be secure from an explosion.  The issue with electronic attacks is that they are often undetected and can also cover a very large number of devices simultaneously.

Electronic attacks can take several forms. 

(a)  Direct interception of data

(b)  Hijacking data input or output

(c)  “Man-in-the-Middle” attacks

(d)  Hijacking of the meter and re-programming

(e)  Viruses

(f)   EMP

(g)  Ability to monitor several properties electronically to check for patterns indicating no one home during the day or vacation mode.

Most important, even if the data transmission itself is secure, the data will eventually reside on a server somewhere.  Servers containing banking information and credit card information are routinely hacked.  Utilities are hacked.  Satellites are hacked.  Military drones are hacked.  The only information that cannot somehow be compromised is information that is never transmitted or stored.

More to come….

9 responses to “Pressing Issues About OG&E’s Smart Meter Rollout

  1. So far, in my location in NC, we have not been had Smart Meters forced upon us. Other areas in NC are offering them as an “option.” However, Duke Energy has taken federal grants to develop Smart Meters, so I am positive this is going to hit us sometime soon. I cannot thank you enough for the information you are providing her so I may share this with my council and commissioners. I am not sure how this can be stopped here, but it must be stopped.
    Happy New Year and Thank You again Very Much!!

  2. Excuse the oops in my English in the previous comment…I meant to say “had,” not “been had.” But we’ve all “been had” on this ….just to be funny.

    I also thought I typed, “you are providing here,” not “her”….this is what I get for going too fast! Thanks for allowing me to correct those errors.

  3. Cheryl, what I wouldn’t give for an editor! I try not to sweat the typos or I will go nuts.
    You are welcome for the information! Glad it is useful.
    Ax

  4. What really good information this is although OG&E and the Corp. Commission deny most of it!! They say absolutely that Smart Meters are not sensitive enough to detect when somebody’s air conditioner comes on. Obviously they can, and these meters will be used at some point in the future to determine if your carbon footprint is too large due to useage which is too much for the number of occupants in a dwelling. Of course it all meshes together with Agenda 21 and the push to get everybody(except the elite) to live in high rises downtown because that will be the only kind of housing and public transportation that most EVERYBODY will be able to afford including heating and cooling it because of severe tax penalties for carbon footprints larger than the government standard!

  5. Robert Semands

    If we could get a hearing would the consultant be willing to testify as an “expert witness?”

    Thanks for all of your efforts Kaye! You are a patriot.

  6. He might. I will ask.
    Thank you Robert!

  7. Thanks for the info, Kaye.

  8. In my opinion, some key points in addition to those highlighted in the above post need to be shared:
    1. Contrary to utility company claims, there are NO federal mandates to install smart meters in the US.
    2. NO State utility appears to have the authority to mandate the installation of smart meters containing wired and/or wireless networking abilities used to penetrate the boundaries of private properties (personal or business) without the written permission of the owner and occupant.
    3. The Chief Executives of each state (Governors) should be required by citizens to issue an Executive Order to the appropriate Public Utility Commissions and Legislative Committees notifying them that all executive orders and/or statutes authorizing the smart meter programs shall not be interpreted as allowing mandatory installation and activation of such devices. Such intrusive devices must be made available only on an “Opt-In” basis. Utility proposed “opt-out” procedures must be declared illegal as they could be used to defraud the utility customers.
    4. It is unlikely that smart meters can be made mandatory in any state since it would be considered unauthorized “wire tapping”. Secret monitoring and reporting on private utility usage should be judged violations of federal and state laws against unreasonable searches and unauthorized wiretapping. Law enforcement agencies can secretly wire-tap private property, but they must have a court order based on reasonable suspicions of criminal activity.
    5. Utility companies have no basis for being allowed to “mandate” their business interests in violation of both US and state Constitutions. Customer MUST be made FULLY aware of the intrusive features of the utility networking capabilities of their smart meters that wirelessly connect to the “Smart Grid”–on an annual basis. Such disclosures must be signed by the property owner and be available as legal evidence should a dispute arise in the future.
    6. Every utility customer MUST be allowed to decline such intrusive networking and reporting services at ANY TIME they wish without being charged anything for opting-out except a one-time, actual cost-based service fee. Customers electing to opt-in to the smart meter programs should be required to pay for the extra costs of participating in such programs. Those who refuse to opt-in should be protected by law from having to subsidize those who willingly participate.
    7. Energy commissions and utility companies have never had the authority to do more than capture utility consumption data monthly and bill accordingly. Energy companies who illegally claim to have the mandated authority to install smart meters with plans for invasive networking abilities to detect, report private information, and intercede on behalf of the utility to terminate or temporarily reduce the utility consumption without specific written permission by the property owner or occupant could be charged with criminal violations.
    8. Utility company employees and sub-contractors involved in installing smart meters without having the notarized written permission of the customer should be subject to criminal felony charges.
    9. To avoid unnecessary utility expenses, customers should be allowed to own their own “utility-certified” meters and to sign binding agreements to report monthly on their meter readings.
    10. Such law clarifications by the Governors on behalf of the Constitutional Rights of citizens is necessary because it is clear that the utility and electronics industries and their regulatory government offices are intending to use “implied consent” as their basis for gradually implementing all of the intrusive features planned for smart meters within the next few years. In most states, the utility companies appear to be rushing to install smart meters without including all of the wire-tapping features with the clear intent to wirelessly install massive new, intrusive monitoring, reporting and control features without the customer’s knowledge when it suits the utility company interests..

    Sincerely,

    Robert E. Frank, Colonel, USAF (Ret.)
    safe_mail@cox.net
    Henderson, NV

  9. Pete in Tulsa

    I’m going to freak out and go look again..haven’t been watching tv news so was in the dark on the Oklahoma rollout..I need to post my signage before they get here…David Dees painting or skull and crossbones or an old man with a shotgun..GET OUTTA HERE WITH THAT!”
    8-P
    I read the safety report that OG&E paid for, both it and “information” posted at OCC contain obvious falsehoods that are easily refuted by a quick search at the IEEE-EXPLORE website. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/searchresult.jsp?newsearch=true&queryText=biological+effects+of+nonionizing+radiation&x=0&y=0

    This is a weapons system. (search youtube for “BIG DATA, and SMART GRID” and watch the HP and IBM commercials..

    Question for your expert…and I have many more..feel free to email me at the address I used to post..I noticed my cable service enters at the meter(I presume to use the ground spike….wondering if this thing can sniff packets off my hardwired internet service…via inductive signals. they’re a foot apart and I’ll bet the cable box has loops.(that would boost the signal)

    I bookmarked but don’t social network…so I’ll try to remember to post the results after I SURVEY the EMF safety compliance here…(waiting for a scope)…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s