Kaye Beach
Dec. 16, 2013
Ohio is the first state to reject the federal Real ID Act solely on the basis of the biometric (facial recognition) collection.
(Read Biometrics 101 -Your Body is Your Id)
When people really understand that the mass collection of biometrics on ordinary people turns all of us into suspects and transforms our rights into privileges, sensible people will reject it.
State officials balked at the “one driver-one license” rule and at being required to store and share copies of personal documents, such as birth certificates, said Joe Andrews, spokesman for the Ohio Department of Public Safety…The objection is that it’s not acceptable in many circles in Ohio to do facial recognition on everyone who comes in to get a license,” http://www.dispatch.com//content/stories/local/2013/12/06/state-pulls-plans-to-comply-with-federal-id-law.html
Ohio had been set and ready to go with Real ID but when residents and legislators got a whiff of what Real ID with its facial biometric requirement was really about, they weren’t so happy.
After Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine
quietly added a facial recognition capability to the
Ohio Law Enforcement Gateway, which gives government officials unified access to databases for their browsing pleasure, state residents became a tad creeped out that they’d been conscripted into an ongoing police line-up. Link
The actuality of harm to our rights inherent in mandatory biometric ID is beginning to become apparent. Compared to a few years ago, it is now much easier for the people and their legislators to see what this technology is and how it is being used and they are taking issue with it.
Recently Missouri legislators completed an investigation into privacy violations of Missouri residents and found that the state’s Department of Revenue has continued implementation of the federal Real ID Act in spite of state law prohibiting it.
Mo. House Committee Releases Report Accusing DOR Of Breaking 2009 Anti-REAL ID Law
“The Department of Revenue adopted a system of scanning and retention of source documents,” Cox said. “They acquired and they spent considerable money in obtaining biometric information on citizens, they adopted the central issuance of driver’s licenses, and finally adopted what’s sometimes referred to as Level Three security, which is also a feature of (the) REAL ID Act, according to the Homeland Security Secretary, Janet Napolitano.”
But the federal government says it still intends to force the Real ID Act on the states.
National Conference of State Legislatures (NSCL)
Oct. 2013REAL ID Enforcement on Its Way
In a recent meeting with NCSL, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) confirmed it is on schedule to announce, later this year, a timeline for the phased-in enforcement of the federal REAL ID Act.There will likely be four to six phases, with each phase focusing on the use of REAL ID-compliant IDs in different settings, such as to board commercial aircraft.
Each phase will consist of three steps: 1) signage regarding the upcoming enforcement, 2) verbal warnings of enforcement and 3) hard
enforcement.Full enforcement of REAL ID is expected to begin
in two to three years. Approximately 21 states are expected to already be in full compliance when DHS releases the timeline this year.http://www.ncsl.org/documents/transportation/TRN-Oct2013.pdf
While the stealth national/international biometric ID has remained largely hidden from mass awareness, that is going to change. More and more citizens and legislators will become aware of the reality of mandatory biometric ID being forced upon the American people and we can expect that this reality will create a new wave of battles. It won’t be a moment too soon though because the fact is that all states are collecting digital facial images suitable for use with facial recognition technology which means you can kiss your privacy, autonomy and religious freedom goodbye unless its stopped.
I am engaged in my own battle against mandatory biometric ID right now. I want to know if I have the right NOT to be enrolled into this system of biometric identification and financial control. Many would benefit from a favorable ruling in my lawsuit and I am asking for your support to help me win my case.
Please help me stop mandatory biometric enrollment by making as generous a contribution to my legal fund as you are able to today.
If you wish to donate to my legal defense fund, you may do so online through Paypal.com
By US mail, you can send a check or money order to;
Kaye Beach
P.O. Box 722381
Norman, Oklahoma, 73070
(Please make the check out to “Kaye Beach”. You may write “legal defense fund” in the memo section of your check or money order)
Thank you and God Bless,